Friday, December 30, 2005
Dubya's Holiday Greeting
Click on 2-0-5 George Bush's Year in Review! Don't forget to turn on your sound!
Wednesday, December 28, 2005
Goodbye Siesta
At a time where I'm on full-time siesta (changing jobs; taking out weeks of saved vacation), Spain has (finally) decided to scrap the siesta. A long overdue decision, I'll say. My friend Céline has often complained about being forced to take siesta while working in a Barcelona suburb where there's nothing to do and too far away for being able to return home for the break.
But from this week all Spanish government employees (actually, since Céline works in the private sector, this might not actually solve her problem) will take one hour lunch, as is customary in most other European countries. And between 12 noon and 1 pm, not after two in the afternoon. The new legislation will allow employees to return home by six pm instead of eight or nine, and give them more time for family and friends.
One of the main reasons for the change is that is that the traditional siesta has not exactly helped Spain's competitiveness. Spaniards work more than most countries in the world - tenth place when it comes to working hours - but their type of "work ethic" does not translate into productivity or efficiency. In addition, Spanish workers sleep 40 minutes less every night compared to the average European. A more urgent rationale is the fact that in a globalised world, Spain cannot keep on closing offices and switchboards for three hours in the afternoon, when the rest of the world stays open. Shops adopted new hours already years ago.
So this should be a welcome change for Spain as an economy and for the Spanish people.
But from this week all Spanish government employees (actually, since Céline works in the private sector, this might not actually solve her problem) will take one hour lunch, as is customary in most other European countries. And between 12 noon and 1 pm, not after two in the afternoon. The new legislation will allow employees to return home by six pm instead of eight or nine, and give them more time for family and friends.
One of the main reasons for the change is that is that the traditional siesta has not exactly helped Spain's competitiveness. Spaniards work more than most countries in the world - tenth place when it comes to working hours - but their type of "work ethic" does not translate into productivity or efficiency. In addition, Spanish workers sleep 40 minutes less every night compared to the average European. A more urgent rationale is the fact that in a globalised world, Spain cannot keep on closing offices and switchboards for three hours in the afternoon, when the rest of the world stays open. Shops adopted new hours already years ago.
So this should be a welcome change for Spain as an economy and for the Spanish people.
Tuesday, December 27, 2005
Holiday Greetings
A bit late... but Merry Christmas! Or the more p.c. Season's Greetings or Happy Holidays. Or God Jul in Swedish. And Happy New Year!
P.S. Will try to post some pictures from Canada. I haven't really made a habit of posting photos but perhaps it should be a new year's resolution for my blog.
P.S. Will try to post some pictures from Canada. I haven't really made a habit of posting photos but perhaps it should be a new year's resolution for my blog.
Thursday, December 15, 2005
Toronto
Just a quick post that I'm currently visiting some friends in Toronto, Canada. At the moment it's snowing heavily but hopefully I'll be able to (get home from this Internet cafe and) visit the Shoe Museum and Niagara Falls before I leave on Sunday! So far I've mostly been shopping and hanging out with my friend Helena and her baby girl Ester, plus visited the CN Tower.
Monday, December 05, 2005
Quick fix
According to a new study by the Swedish Ministry of Finance, 82 % of taxes paid are refunded, i.e. benefitting the tax payer him/herself; 45 % even in the same year as it is taxed. How? Through subsidised education, grants, childcare, etc.*
* The study covers Sweden, no data on other countries.
* The study covers Sweden, no data on other countries.
Wednesday, November 30, 2005
Ginger Spice
Yes, I did go to a Spice Girls concert once but that's not what this post is about.
This time of the year, Swedes consume A LOT of ginger thins, or pepparkakor as we call it. We eat them all year around but the holiday season is the peak. Pepparkakor was plentiful already back 1,800 B.C. in Mesopotamia, because they kept long and wasn't attacked by mildew. Roman soldiers used to keep pepparkakor in their rations. In the 15th century nuns in the nunnery at Vadstena baked pepparkakor for medicinal reasons; the spicy and sweet cookies were thought to help with digestion. The Swedish "pepparkaka" refers to old receipes where pepper was one of the medicinal ingredients. Pepper has also been a term used for spices in general.
One of my favourite brand of pepparkakor (except for homemade ones) is Anna's (of course!). Anna's was founded in 1929 by two north Swedes, sisters Anna and Emma Karlsson, who ran a domestic household school and a bakery in Stockholm. The cookies became so popular that the bakery turned into a company and in 1945 the factory was moved to what is now the Stockholm suburbs. 1963 the company was bought by the Mattsson family who still owns it. In 1978 Anna's went abroad and today the company produce over 3,000 tonnes cookies annually, of which 60 % is exported and sold e.g. at IKEAs around the world. In Sweden, Anna's has 45 employees but the cookies are also produced at other locations such as Calgary, Canada, where 500 tonnes cookies come out of the owen.
Swedes are perhaps a bit traditional and prefer the original flavour but in other parts of the world, Anna's has experimented with mint, orange, almond and other flavours. Swedes are more for the combos, such as the original flavour with blue cheese (roquefort or gorgonzola). I know, I didn't believe when I first heard about a few years back, but it's delicious!
This time of the year, Swedes consume A LOT of ginger thins, or pepparkakor as we call it. We eat them all year around but the holiday season is the peak. Pepparkakor was plentiful already back 1,800 B.C. in Mesopotamia, because they kept long and wasn't attacked by mildew. Roman soldiers used to keep pepparkakor in their rations. In the 15th century nuns in the nunnery at Vadstena baked pepparkakor for medicinal reasons; the spicy and sweet cookies were thought to help with digestion. The Swedish "pepparkaka" refers to old receipes where pepper was one of the medicinal ingredients. Pepper has also been a term used for spices in general.
One of my favourite brand of pepparkakor (except for homemade ones) is Anna's (of course!). Anna's was founded in 1929 by two north Swedes, sisters Anna and Emma Karlsson, who ran a domestic household school and a bakery in Stockholm. The cookies became so popular that the bakery turned into a company and in 1945 the factory was moved to what is now the Stockholm suburbs. 1963 the company was bought by the Mattsson family who still owns it. In 1978 Anna's went abroad and today the company produce over 3,000 tonnes cookies annually, of which 60 % is exported and sold e.g. at IKEAs around the world. In Sweden, Anna's has 45 employees but the cookies are also produced at other locations such as Calgary, Canada, where 500 tonnes cookies come out of the owen.
Swedes are perhaps a bit traditional and prefer the original flavour but in other parts of the world, Anna's has experimented with mint, orange, almond and other flavours. Swedes are more for the combos, such as the original flavour with blue cheese (roquefort or gorgonzola). I know, I didn't believe when I first heard about a few years back, but it's delicious!
Tuesday, November 29, 2005
e-Wasteland
Some basic but sad facts of e-waste*:
- 4,000 tonnes of toxic e-waste is discarded in the world every hour, equivalent to the weight of 1,000 e-lephants
- Between 1997 and 2007, experts estimate that there will be more than 500 million obsolete computers in the US alone. That includes 2.87 million tonnes plastics, 717,000 tonnes lead, 1.36 million tonnes cadmium, 862,000 tonnes chromium, and 287 tonnes mercury.
- The Basel Convention on Transboundary Movements of Harzardous Wastes and their Disposal (1994) bans export of all hazardous waste from rich to poor countries for any reason, including recycling. The US, Australia and Canada have failed to ratify the Basel Convention.
- 50-80 % of the e-waste collected for recycling in western US is not recycled domestically, but shipped in containers to destinations such as China
- Imports of e-waste have been illegal in China since 1996, so there is no official figures on how much is coming into the country, but environmental groups and academics estimate that Guiyu alone handles more than a million tonnes of e-waste annually
- In May this year, Greenpeace China tried to shame electronics companies attending a trade show in Beijing by unveiling a 2.7 m high statue in the shape of a wave built using the companies' e-waste collected from Guiyu
- The Computer TakeBack campaign aims to protect the health and well-being of electronic users, workers, and the communities where electronics are produced and discarded, by requiring electronic manufacturers and brand owners to take full responsibility for the life cycle of their products.
Source: Scanorama Magazine, November 2005
*electronic waste
Thursday, November 17, 2005
Teenage Alert
I sometimes check out the blog of an American woman in exile in Skellefteå, which is a town quite far up north in Sweden. She has three children, among them a girl who just turned 9. Last week they headed to the town centre in the afternoon - and by 4 pm it's pretty dark already in Sweden this time of the year. Under the heading "Be afraid... be very afraid", Beverly writes:
"As we were walking from the shopping center to where we had parked the car, Lydia said to me, “I don’t like being in town at night. It’s all dark and scary and the teenagers come. Teenagers come mostly at night, right?”
Hilarious and cute at the same time!
"As we were walking from the shopping center to where we had parked the car, Lydia said to me, “I don’t like being in town at night. It’s all dark and scary and the teenagers come. Teenagers come mostly at night, right?”
Hilarious and cute at the same time!
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
The Asylum Tribunal 2005
On Monday evening I attended a very special event here in Stockholm, the Asylum Tribunal. Based on the historic Russell Tribunal of 1967, the Asylum Tribunal investigated a state's crime against humanity. In 1967, experts and prominent guests gathered in Stockholm to determine whether US warfare in Vietnam broke international law. Now Swedish and international expertise met again in Stockholm, but this time the indicted is Sweden itself. Is the Swedish state breaking Swedish law and international conventions to which we are signatories? According to these laws and conventions people who are fleeing persecution and oppression, torture and other inhumane treatment, have the right to receive protection and residence permit in Sweden. But fewer and fewer are granted asylum or residence.
The procedings were led by qualified jurists who called in experts and witnesses: international law experts, legal and political sciencists, doctors, psychiatrists, etc. A jury consisting of prominent people - among them George Bizos, legendary human rights lawyer from South Africa - gave a final verdict.
The Tribunal tried to answer the questions:
• Is the asylum law being undermined and hollowed out?
• Is the rich Europe - and Sweden - closing its doors to persecuted people?
• Do we want to live in a country and in a world where one of the basic human rights - the right to asylum - is neglected?
Many people in Sweden believe that Sweden is very generous and that we welcome hords of refugees every year but the truth is that never before has Sweden admitted so few asylum seekers. Only 1,45 % of asylum applications were approved last year compared to 45 % in Canada. Moreover, no other country has been convicted by the Committee Against Torture (CAT, the UN organ) so many times (11) as Sweden. Not for torturing people but for sending people back to countries where they risk being tortured.
Needless to say, Sweden was convicted by the Tribunal jury. They have written a number of recommendations for Sweden, which I will post here when they become available.
The procedings were led by qualified jurists who called in experts and witnesses: international law experts, legal and political sciencists, doctors, psychiatrists, etc. A jury consisting of prominent people - among them George Bizos, legendary human rights lawyer from South Africa - gave a final verdict.
The Tribunal tried to answer the questions:
• Is the asylum law being undermined and hollowed out?
• Is the rich Europe - and Sweden - closing its doors to persecuted people?
• Do we want to live in a country and in a world where one of the basic human rights - the right to asylum - is neglected?
Many people in Sweden believe that Sweden is very generous and that we welcome hords of refugees every year but the truth is that never before has Sweden admitted so few asylum seekers. Only 1,45 % of asylum applications were approved last year compared to 45 % in Canada. Moreover, no other country has been convicted by the Committee Against Torture (CAT, the UN organ) so many times (11) as Sweden. Not for torturing people but for sending people back to countries where they risk being tortured.
Needless to say, Sweden was convicted by the Tribunal jury. They have written a number of recommendations for Sweden, which I will post here when they become available.
Wednesday, November 09, 2005
Confession
I'm such a sucker for gossip. Not the office rumour spreading but the whereabouts and activities of the Hollywood crowd and the like. I mentioned Defamer earlier but two of the best sites at the moment are Pink Is the New Blog and Just Jared. Enjoy!
Wednesday, November 02, 2005
Work Ethic: Part One
Yes, I know, I've been a poor blogger lately. I've simply had too much to do, both work-wise and in the evenings. I will tell you in due time. For those of you who are not that busy at work but would like to appear to be, here's a list of tricks to apply in various circumstances at work in order to seem like the busy, diligent bee.
23. Delaying. If your boss comes and asks you for a chat, don’t bounce right away. Delay by saying “I’ll be there as soon as I finish this.”
Advantage: You appear to have integrity and moreover, you buy time to prepare for the meeting.
22. The Jimmy Connors trick. To be tired is human. To doze off at work is bad. The solution is to pretend to pick up paper clips though you’re actually sleeping. Like Jim Connors sort of. Sprinkle paper clips on the floor, lean forward and slumber. If someone comes in you pretend you’re picking.
Advantage: No one notices that you’re tired and sleeping like a baby.
21. The “I do work” trick. Reject phone calls when you’re on your way home on Fridays after lunch. If you get a message, return the call at 18.45 and explain that you’ve been in a telephone conference until now.
Advantage 1: You appear to be sacrificing everything for work.
Advantage 2: The person in question avoids leaving messages coming Fridays.
20. The reading trick. Put your own reading inside e.g. a relevant annual report. Lean back towards a fall and enjoy Hello magazine.
Advantage: You’re seen as a person who keeps his/herself informed.
19. The important telephone call trick. You’re in an open-plan office and a friend calls. Say loudly: “Then I will just collect some material and find a meeting room”. You’re free to chat and gossip for at least 15 minutes.
Advantage: You appear to be an important person who is consulted on important issues.
18. The font 6 trick. Write private emails with text in font size 6 so that people passing by cannot read them. For further smoke screen, keep excel sheets open half-screen.
Advantage: You can write whatever you want, whenever you want.
17. The ”I’m in the game” trick. At the weekly meeting, always express your opinion with authoritative voice early on in the meeting – preferably in general terms that data steer documents and the ball is round.
Advantage: You appear to be in the game.
16. The email trick. Write some general email to co-workers and preset the transmission time so that the emails are portioned out at regular intervals during the day. You’re free to play golf or pick your nails. Transmission time Sunday should be avoided.
Advantage: You seem to have an even and high work capacity.
15. The walk and talk trick. Important job call? Take a walk around the office with the office mobile phone, wave your arms and say loud and clear: “I hear what you’re saying and I understand – but it does not change anything”.
Advantage: You seem to have authority.
14. The offensive walk trick. With high speed, purposefully. When it comes to walking decidedly there only one no-no: you cannot seemed stressed.
Advantage: Make you seem effective and efficient.
13. The mobile at the meeting trick. Ask the other meeting participants if it’s okay that you keep your mobile switched on as you’re expecting an extremely important call. Leave when it rings.
Advantage: Make you seem (more) important.
12. The ”classic”. Or the ”light switched on and coat left behind” trick. To leave the office without turning your light off, without turning off your computer and without taking your coat. Warning: If you use it too often your colleagues might see through it.
Advantage: It looks like you’re still at work although you’re not.
To be continued.
23. Delaying. If your boss comes and asks you for a chat, don’t bounce right away. Delay by saying “I’ll be there as soon as I finish this.”
Advantage: You appear to have integrity and moreover, you buy time to prepare for the meeting.
22. The Jimmy Connors trick. To be tired is human. To doze off at work is bad. The solution is to pretend to pick up paper clips though you’re actually sleeping. Like Jim Connors sort of. Sprinkle paper clips on the floor, lean forward and slumber. If someone comes in you pretend you’re picking.
Advantage: No one notices that you’re tired and sleeping like a baby.
21. The “I do work” trick. Reject phone calls when you’re on your way home on Fridays after lunch. If you get a message, return the call at 18.45 and explain that you’ve been in a telephone conference until now.
Advantage 1: You appear to be sacrificing everything for work.
Advantage 2: The person in question avoids leaving messages coming Fridays.
20. The reading trick. Put your own reading inside e.g. a relevant annual report. Lean back towards a fall and enjoy Hello magazine.
Advantage: You’re seen as a person who keeps his/herself informed.
19. The important telephone call trick. You’re in an open-plan office and a friend calls. Say loudly: “Then I will just collect some material and find a meeting room”. You’re free to chat and gossip for at least 15 minutes.
Advantage: You appear to be an important person who is consulted on important issues.
18. The font 6 trick. Write private emails with text in font size 6 so that people passing by cannot read them. For further smoke screen, keep excel sheets open half-screen.
Advantage: You can write whatever you want, whenever you want.
17. The ”I’m in the game” trick. At the weekly meeting, always express your opinion with authoritative voice early on in the meeting – preferably in general terms that data steer documents and the ball is round.
Advantage: You appear to be in the game.
16. The email trick. Write some general email to co-workers and preset the transmission time so that the emails are portioned out at regular intervals during the day. You’re free to play golf or pick your nails. Transmission time Sunday should be avoided.
Advantage: You seem to have an even and high work capacity.
15. The walk and talk trick. Important job call? Take a walk around the office with the office mobile phone, wave your arms and say loud and clear: “I hear what you’re saying and I understand – but it does not change anything”.
Advantage: You seem to have authority.
14. The offensive walk trick. With high speed, purposefully. When it comes to walking decidedly there only one no-no: you cannot seemed stressed.
Advantage: Make you seem effective and efficient.
13. The mobile at the meeting trick. Ask the other meeting participants if it’s okay that you keep your mobile switched on as you’re expecting an extremely important call. Leave when it rings.
Advantage: Make you seem (more) important.
12. The ”classic”. Or the ”light switched on and coat left behind” trick. To leave the office without turning your light off, without turning off your computer and without taking your coat. Warning: If you use it too often your colleagues might see through it.
Advantage: It looks like you’re still at work although you’re not.
To be continued.
Monday, October 17, 2005
Random Mission
Mission: Write 20 random facts about yourself
Assignment by: Aunty Marianne
Deadline: October 17, 2005, 23:00
1. I had to have two surgeries on my left eye by the time I was 18 months old due to a extra fat tissue on my eyelid. Fortunately, the doctors did a good job and today you can hardly notice it.
2. Continuing on the same theme, I had appendicitis in the summer of 1996 when I was an aupair in Pittsburgh, USA. Fortunately I had good insurance coverage so I didn't have to foot a penny of the $15K bill. I did have some complications though (vein bursting from the IV and loss of feeling in my thigh for almost a year due to a pain shot that hit a nerve) and was told later I could have sued the hospital, but being Swedish the thought didn't even cross my mind.
3. When I was 10 I stepped on a rusty nail that almost went through my foot (same theme). I had to have a tetanus shot and missed my third grade leaving party, but otherwise I was fine. I just have a tiny, almost not noticeable scar today.
4. I played football for seven years (age 9-16) but never got hurt. I don't know if that means I was lucky or that I wasn't a very good player...
5. I tried rugby after quitting football but only lasted one practice. I lasted at least a few weeks when I tried athletics (track-and-field) but that was when I was much younger.
6. I stopped playing football because I couldn't participate in all practices (and then they wouldn't let you play matches) due to a growing political interest and membership in the local Social Democratic youth club in Södertälje (though I was on the barricades with my mum at the May 1 demonstrations already as a toddler).
7. I had a seat on a local council (Södertälje) dealing with disability issues for three years 1994-1997 but had to resign when I moved to Uppsala to study. These particular issues are dear to me since I have a brother who's mentally handicapped (but such a fun guy nonetheless!).
8. I have a degree from Oxford, which my working class self would never have imagined ten years ago. But I didn't have a problem socialising with the likes of Emirate princesses and Chelsea Clinton (my interaction with the latter consisted of giving directions to the "restroom").
9. Otherwise I hardly ever see any celebrities, but when I was living in London I lived in the same street as John Cleese.
10. I used to think Brad Pitt was gorgeous but since this Jolie thing his star has fallen in my sky because I'm definitely on Team Aniston.
11. I just LOVE "Friends"! My friend Kim and I have so much fun watching that show and she's so good at remembering all the lines and bringing them into conversations and situations!
12. Kim (who lives in England) doesn't have any children yet but otherwise so many of my friends are producing babies like on a conveyor belt. They are cute but sometimes I just want to have friends who want to go for a beer or take a trip...
13. When I have children one day, I'm going to have a girl called Isolde, otherwise it's not happening!
14. I have tried Internet dating - in order to find the father to Isolde - and I recommend it! It's fun!
15. I have never purchased anything on eBay. I actually don't think shopping is that fun though I seem to spend money nevertheless.
16. I'm a book-a-holic - the big black hole where my pay check goes - but I don't read as much. They need to sit on my bookshelf for a while to "mature".
17. I'm on the lookout for a Butler's Tray to go with my couch and my book shelves.
18. I want to build a house in American colonial style in Sweden one day.
19. I don't mind paying more than half of my income in taxes. I'm sure it will come back to me one day one way or the other.
20. I love ice cream! In fact, I think I'm going to have some now!
Assignment by: Aunty Marianne
Deadline: October 17, 2005, 23:00
1. I had to have two surgeries on my left eye by the time I was 18 months old due to a extra fat tissue on my eyelid. Fortunately, the doctors did a good job and today you can hardly notice it.
2. Continuing on the same theme, I had appendicitis in the summer of 1996 when I was an aupair in Pittsburgh, USA. Fortunately I had good insurance coverage so I didn't have to foot a penny of the $15K bill. I did have some complications though (vein bursting from the IV and loss of feeling in my thigh for almost a year due to a pain shot that hit a nerve) and was told later I could have sued the hospital, but being Swedish the thought didn't even cross my mind.
3. When I was 10 I stepped on a rusty nail that almost went through my foot (same theme). I had to have a tetanus shot and missed my third grade leaving party, but otherwise I was fine. I just have a tiny, almost not noticeable scar today.
4. I played football for seven years (age 9-16) but never got hurt. I don't know if that means I was lucky or that I wasn't a very good player...
5. I tried rugby after quitting football but only lasted one practice. I lasted at least a few weeks when I tried athletics (track-and-field) but that was when I was much younger.
6. I stopped playing football because I couldn't participate in all practices (and then they wouldn't let you play matches) due to a growing political interest and membership in the local Social Democratic youth club in Södertälje (though I was on the barricades with my mum at the May 1 demonstrations already as a toddler).
7. I had a seat on a local council (Södertälje) dealing with disability issues for three years 1994-1997 but had to resign when I moved to Uppsala to study. These particular issues are dear to me since I have a brother who's mentally handicapped (but such a fun guy nonetheless!).
8. I have a degree from Oxford, which my working class self would never have imagined ten years ago. But I didn't have a problem socialising with the likes of Emirate princesses and Chelsea Clinton (my interaction with the latter consisted of giving directions to the "restroom").
9. Otherwise I hardly ever see any celebrities, but when I was living in London I lived in the same street as John Cleese.
10. I used to think Brad Pitt was gorgeous but since this Jolie thing his star has fallen in my sky because I'm definitely on Team Aniston.
11. I just LOVE "Friends"! My friend Kim and I have so much fun watching that show and she's so good at remembering all the lines and bringing them into conversations and situations!
12. Kim (who lives in England) doesn't have any children yet but otherwise so many of my friends are producing babies like on a conveyor belt. They are cute but sometimes I just want to have friends who want to go for a beer or take a trip...
13. When I have children one day, I'm going to have a girl called Isolde, otherwise it's not happening!
14. I have tried Internet dating - in order to find the father to Isolde - and I recommend it! It's fun!
15. I have never purchased anything on eBay. I actually don't think shopping is that fun though I seem to spend money nevertheless.
16. I'm a book-a-holic - the big black hole where my pay check goes - but I don't read as much. They need to sit on my bookshelf for a while to "mature".
17. I'm on the lookout for a Butler's Tray to go with my couch and my book shelves.
18. I want to build a house in American colonial style in Sweden one day.
19. I don't mind paying more than half of my income in taxes. I'm sure it will come back to me one day one way or the other.
20. I love ice cream! In fact, I think I'm going to have some now!
Saturday, October 15, 2005
Turkishtravel.org
My previous blog about my visit to Turkey this past summer has been published by a travel site called Turkish Travel! Look here.
Tuesday, October 04, 2005
Turkish Delight
When I visited Turkey this summer I promised to blog about it but then didn't actually get around to doing so. But now, with the EU, after delays and late-night mangling, finally having agreed to start membership negotiations with Turkey, it a good time as any.
I visited the town of Marmaris in the southwest of Turkey with a friend for about a week. Marmaris is located in a bay of the Mediterranean with a beautiful marina, below the green, majestic Taurus mountains. Taurus actually continues all the way through Asia and turns into Himalaya. Sultan Süleyman the Great had a fortress built in the 1500s and founded the city. Legend has it that when the Sultan returned home in one of his ships and saw the finished fortress, he shouted "Mimar as!", which means "Hang the architect!". Hence the name Marmaris today.
We spent a lot of time at the beach (it being the main reason for the trip) but with the temperature approaching 40 Celcius degrees, it was nice, and also the plan, to set aside some time for sightseeing outside town. Except for the obligatory Hamam, we took a day-tour to Dalyan and Kaunos, which included a river boat ride passed ancient royal graves carved in a mountain side, a mudbath at an ancient spa location, and a swim at a beach where the Caretta turtle lays her eggs. Another excursion brought us to Pamukkale, with its magnificent white limestone basins, making it one of the natural wonders of the world. On the way to Pamukkale we made a very interesting visit to a rug factory - had I known I would have taken my savings and bought one of the amazing silk rugs!
On the way to these sights we passed through a number of different towns and villages. I must say that I was surprised in both positive and negative ways. I knew Turkey was a very varied country, with Istanbul and other cities quite developed while the majority of the country is mainly rural and undeveloped; however, I wasn't prepared that Marmaris and other cities would feel so much like (especially southern and Eastern) European cities, while travelling through the countryside felt like going back in time to a 1950's Sweden. To take an example: People of all ages were working in the field in very old-fashioned clothes with tools seemingly from the pre-industrial area!
So Turkey has a long way to come but the best road to take is the European highway, even if it has to keep by a speed limit of 5 km an hour and sometimes do a U-turn and make a fresh start. On the way it has a lot of important passengers to pick up: democracy, human rights, a new account of its history, the role of the military, economic development, etc. Luckily it has extra drivers, some a bit reluctant but most of them forthcoming.
I visited the town of Marmaris in the southwest of Turkey with a friend for about a week. Marmaris is located in a bay of the Mediterranean with a beautiful marina, below the green, majestic Taurus mountains. Taurus actually continues all the way through Asia and turns into Himalaya. Sultan Süleyman the Great had a fortress built in the 1500s and founded the city. Legend has it that when the Sultan returned home in one of his ships and saw the finished fortress, he shouted "Mimar as!", which means "Hang the architect!". Hence the name Marmaris today.
We spent a lot of time at the beach (it being the main reason for the trip) but with the temperature approaching 40 Celcius degrees, it was nice, and also the plan, to set aside some time for sightseeing outside town. Except for the obligatory Hamam, we took a day-tour to Dalyan and Kaunos, which included a river boat ride passed ancient royal graves carved in a mountain side, a mudbath at an ancient spa location, and a swim at a beach where the Caretta turtle lays her eggs. Another excursion brought us to Pamukkale, with its magnificent white limestone basins, making it one of the natural wonders of the world. On the way to Pamukkale we made a very interesting visit to a rug factory - had I known I would have taken my savings and bought one of the amazing silk rugs!
On the way to these sights we passed through a number of different towns and villages. I must say that I was surprised in both positive and negative ways. I knew Turkey was a very varied country, with Istanbul and other cities quite developed while the majority of the country is mainly rural and undeveloped; however, I wasn't prepared that Marmaris and other cities would feel so much like (especially southern and Eastern) European cities, while travelling through the countryside felt like going back in time to a 1950's Sweden. To take an example: People of all ages were working in the field in very old-fashioned clothes with tools seemingly from the pre-industrial area!
So Turkey has a long way to come but the best road to take is the European highway, even if it has to keep by a speed limit of 5 km an hour and sometimes do a U-turn and make a fresh start. On the way it has a lot of important passengers to pick up: democracy, human rights, a new account of its history, the role of the military, economic development, etc. Luckily it has extra drivers, some a bit reluctant but most of them forthcoming.
Monday, October 03, 2005
Euroverdict
My friend and former flatmate in Brussels, Marianne, told me about this Euro quiz by the BBC. It's created for a British audience but give it a go anyway!
Not surprisingly my result was:
Mr and Mrs Chiantishire
This group are Euro enthusiasts; they like all things European from going on holiday to sundried tomatoes and red wine.
The quiz wasn't only about leaisure activities and food, which you might deduct from the verdict, but featured questions about one's attitudes to the euro (€), religion, work, etc.
What's your euroverdict?
Not surprisingly my result was:
Mr and Mrs Chiantishire
This group are Euro enthusiasts; they like all things European from going on holiday to sundried tomatoes and red wine.
The quiz wasn't only about leaisure activities and food, which you might deduct from the verdict, but featured questions about one's attitudes to the euro (€), religion, work, etc.
What's your euroverdict?
Wednesday, September 28, 2005
Sectarian Religion
Jehova's Witness paid me a visit tonight (unsolicited of course):
JW: "I have a text here called the Bible that you may have read."
Me: "Well, I think I have heard of it, it rings a bell..." Duh!
No, I was polite and after about three "no thank you, I'm not interested", off they went.
I can't see anyone who would actually invite them in and on top of that, join, but since they are still doing house calls, it must be successful somehow because why would they otherwise keep on doing it??
Another one of these religious sects (which is what they really are) that I cannot understand anyone would join is the Scientology Church. How come all (okay, many) celebrities are drawn to it? After the Tom Cruise debacle of this year many stars have fallen from my sky.
JW: "I have a text here called the Bible that you may have read."
Me: "Well, I think I have heard of it, it rings a bell..." Duh!
No, I was polite and after about three "no thank you, I'm not interested", off they went.
I can't see anyone who would actually invite them in and on top of that, join, but since they are still doing house calls, it must be successful somehow because why would they otherwise keep on doing it??
Another one of these religious sects (which is what they really are) that I cannot understand anyone would join is the Scientology Church. How come all (okay, many) celebrities are drawn to it? After the Tom Cruise debacle of this year many stars have fallen from my sky.
Monday, September 26, 2005
The Envy of Europe
I wrote earlier about the fact that I always get the question from my international friends "why is Sweden doing so well?" or "how can Sweden have such low unemployment when the rest of Europe has such high rates?", while at the same time Swedish media and the right-wing bloc make it look like Sweden is in deep crisis.
Here's an article on this very topic, titled The Envy of Europe (thanks to Eric for the link).
"Just as scientists marvel at how such an unwieldy insect can actually fly, European leaders want to know how Sweden and its Nordic neighbors, so heavily laden with cradle-to-grave welfare systems, float high above the struggling economies of much of the rest of the Continent."
It tells a more realistic and nuanced story than the dark picture painted by the right-wing.
Here's an article on this very topic, titled The Envy of Europe (thanks to Eric for the link).
"Just as scientists marvel at how such an unwieldy insect can actually fly, European leaders want to know how Sweden and its Nordic neighbors, so heavily laden with cradle-to-grave welfare systems, float high above the struggling economies of much of the rest of the Continent."
It tells a more realistic and nuanced story than the dark picture painted by the right-wing.
Sunday, September 25, 2005
Air flight tax
Since a few weeks ago travellers flying British Airways (BA) can choose to pay a voluntary fee towards projects that compensate for the flight's emissions, and other airlines might follow suit soon.
I think it's a great idea! Did you know that if we divided the number of flights the global population could do without doing any damage to the environment (i.e. status quo or sustainability) , each person would only be able to do a one-way flight between London and New York in a lifetime*. So I have already taken up 20-30 people's lifetime allotment of flights! Sure, most people in the world don't and will never have the opportunity to fly places, but still, the amount of time the rest of spend in the air... it adds up.
BA cooperates with the environmental organisation Climate Care. In this first trial round, passengers may choose between supporting low energy lightbulbs for poor households in South Africa, which reduces the amount of coal burnt, or energy efficient cookers in Honduras, which reduces forest devastation.
The only thing that worries me is the fact that a DN poll showed that almost 70 % would not want to pay such a fee. They don't want to pay a fee that equals the amount they spend on a cup of coffee or a lunch (depending on the distance). Don't they understand that this is an investment in their children's future?
Other airlines are very positive towards the initiative. Passengers are less so, as indicated by the DN poll, maybe because the EU as well as the Swedish government is simultaneously discussing a tax on airplane fuel. According to the Swedish government's (together with the Greens) proposal, a tax would mean 50-100 kronor on top of the price of a one-way ticket. Personally I think subjecting jet fuel to Kyoto and the emissions trading is more interesting than a tax. The airlines themselves, including US companies, are lobbying the European Commission to go with this option rather than taxation. Whatever happens I hope the money goes towards the environment, be it specific environmental projects or towards environmental research and development.
* Stockholm-Paris = 350 kilo greenhouse gases; Stockholm-New York = 1 tonne
I think it's a great idea! Did you know that if we divided the number of flights the global population could do without doing any damage to the environment (i.e. status quo or sustainability) , each person would only be able to do a one-way flight between London and New York in a lifetime*. So I have already taken up 20-30 people's lifetime allotment of flights! Sure, most people in the world don't and will never have the opportunity to fly places, but still, the amount of time the rest of spend in the air... it adds up.
BA cooperates with the environmental organisation Climate Care. In this first trial round, passengers may choose between supporting low energy lightbulbs for poor households in South Africa, which reduces the amount of coal burnt, or energy efficient cookers in Honduras, which reduces forest devastation.
The only thing that worries me is the fact that a DN poll showed that almost 70 % would not want to pay such a fee. They don't want to pay a fee that equals the amount they spend on a cup of coffee or a lunch (depending on the distance). Don't they understand that this is an investment in their children's future?
Other airlines are very positive towards the initiative. Passengers are less so, as indicated by the DN poll, maybe because the EU as well as the Swedish government is simultaneously discussing a tax on airplane fuel. According to the Swedish government's (together with the Greens) proposal, a tax would mean 50-100 kronor on top of the price of a one-way ticket. Personally I think subjecting jet fuel to Kyoto and the emissions trading is more interesting than a tax. The airlines themselves, including US companies, are lobbying the European Commission to go with this option rather than taxation. Whatever happens I hope the money goes towards the environment, be it specific environmental projects or towards environmental research and development.
* Stockholm-Paris = 350 kilo greenhouse gases; Stockholm-New York = 1 tonne
Wednesday, September 21, 2005
So that's why I don't get much done!
On a recent business trip I passed time on a BA flight by reading their in-flight business magazine, where I came across an interesting column by Viv Groskop, "All in a week's work". It starts:
"Mastering the working week is a delicate balance between industry and indolence. Thanks heavens for Tuesdays, or we'd never get anything done."
All week we count down to Friday, 5-4-3-2-1! Monday is the first day after the weekend. We're more tired than rested and need the day to "get ready" for work. Apparently it has even been proven that fewer emails are sent and received on Mondays than any other day of the week. This works for phone calls too so don't make any important calls on Mondays.
Wednesdays is the worst day of the week. Suddenly you realise that Oh, my God, it's already Wednesday and I haven't done half of what I should do this week! The weekend isn't so close but it's still too late to achieve that which you had originally set out to do before the weekend. "Most Wednesdays are paralysed with indecision. Should you work really seriously and hard or should you just postpone everything to next Monday when you'll have a clear week ahead of you again?" Needless to say, most opt for the latter.
Thursday, you are beyond the crisis stage; there's not even a need to panic. You just have to accept that it will have to wait until next week. Thursday is also the day when you can take a sick-day without anyone getting suspicious. If you are at the office, don't those drawers need to be cleaned out? And what about those business card from that conference; they need to go into the CRM.
"Fridays are obviously a joke. To all intents and purposes they are the first day of the weekend, which just happens to be spent in the office." Meetings held on Fridays are pointless. Sometimes important things happen and you'll almost think it's Tuesday, but then you remember and calm down.
So Tuesdays are the only days when actual work is done. Why? Because: "It is the day you realise that you did not do anything on Monday and already a fifth of the week has passed. But, unlike with Wednesdays, it's not too late." So Tuesday is the busy, busy day. You make 27 calls and send 89 emails...
"Mastering the working week is a delicate balance between industry and indolence. Thanks heavens for Tuesdays, or we'd never get anything done."
All week we count down to Friday, 5-4-3-2-1! Monday is the first day after the weekend. We're more tired than rested and need the day to "get ready" for work. Apparently it has even been proven that fewer emails are sent and received on Mondays than any other day of the week. This works for phone calls too so don't make any important calls on Mondays.
Wednesdays is the worst day of the week. Suddenly you realise that Oh, my God, it's already Wednesday and I haven't done half of what I should do this week! The weekend isn't so close but it's still too late to achieve that which you had originally set out to do before the weekend. "Most Wednesdays are paralysed with indecision. Should you work really seriously and hard or should you just postpone everything to next Monday when you'll have a clear week ahead of you again?" Needless to say, most opt for the latter.
Thursday, you are beyond the crisis stage; there's not even a need to panic. You just have to accept that it will have to wait until next week. Thursday is also the day when you can take a sick-day without anyone getting suspicious. If you are at the office, don't those drawers need to be cleaned out? And what about those business card from that conference; they need to go into the CRM.
"Fridays are obviously a joke. To all intents and purposes they are the first day of the weekend, which just happens to be spent in the office." Meetings held on Fridays are pointless. Sometimes important things happen and you'll almost think it's Tuesday, but then you remember and calm down.
So Tuesdays are the only days when actual work is done. Why? Because: "It is the day you realise that you did not do anything on Monday and already a fifth of the week has passed. But, unlike with Wednesdays, it's not too late." So Tuesday is the busy, busy day. You make 27 calls and send 89 emails...
Tuesday, September 20, 2005
Broken English
Just have go give you some highlights from the book Broken English by Stewart Clark!
"Ladies and Gentleman, welcome to the this technical mess."
Swedish politician opening an international trade fair on technology (fair is mässa in Swedish).
" Dear friends, we are the same guys as before, although we have lost our pricks."
When Götabanken blev Gota Bank. The little dots on the o which makes the Swedish letter ö are called prickar in Swedish.
"Bowels in sauce" and "Chicken in spit".
On restaurant menu in Greece. Sorry?
"In case of fire, please stuff a towel under the door and expose yourself at the window."
Hotel sign in Norway. Yes, we are all nudists in Scandinavia...
Sign: "Any person (except players) caught collecting golf balls on this course will be prosecuted and have their balls removed."
Tough measures..
Book title: "Correctly English in 100 days"
Says it all..
"The skier took off with a tremendous fart."
Comment on televised ski jumping. Fart in Swedish is speed.
"Excuse me, what is the fart limit?"
Swedish tourists in England, see above.
"Buttered saucepans and fried hormones"
Menu in Japan. Are those testosterone or estrogen?
"Guests are requested not to smoke or do other disgusting behaviours in bed."
Sign in hotel room in Japan. I agree, it is a disgusting habit!
"Pain and wine included"
From menu, in France I assume..
"Do not put foreign bodies into the lavatory."
Sign on a SAS airplane. Are domestic bodies fine? What about when you're on international territory?
"Ladies and Gentleman, welcome to the this technical mess."
Swedish politician opening an international trade fair on technology (fair is mässa in Swedish).
" Dear friends, we are the same guys as before, although we have lost our pricks."
When Götabanken blev Gota Bank. The little dots on the o which makes the Swedish letter ö are called prickar in Swedish.
"Bowels in sauce" and "Chicken in spit".
On restaurant menu in Greece. Sorry?
"In case of fire, please stuff a towel under the door and expose yourself at the window."
Hotel sign in Norway. Yes, we are all nudists in Scandinavia...
Sign: "Any person (except players) caught collecting golf balls on this course will be prosecuted and have their balls removed."
Tough measures..
Book title: "Correctly English in 100 days"
Says it all..
"The skier took off with a tremendous fart."
Comment on televised ski jumping. Fart in Swedish is speed.
"Excuse me, what is the fart limit?"
Swedish tourists in England, see above.
"Buttered saucepans and fried hormones"
Menu in Japan. Are those testosterone or estrogen?
"Guests are requested not to smoke or do other disgusting behaviours in bed."
Sign in hotel room in Japan. I agree, it is a disgusting habit!
"Pain and wine included"
From menu, in France I assume..
"Do not put foreign bodies into the lavatory."
Sign on a SAS airplane. Are domestic bodies fine? What about when you're on international territory?
Wednesday, September 14, 2005
Hotdog, only 100 euros!
Today I came across an extraordinary offer in one of the Stockholm tube stations!
"Hot dog 999 kronor" (€107; $133)
It obviously caught my interest, urging me to read further. Turns out it's a UNDP campaign - by PR firm Futurniture* - drawing attention to the fact that more that a billion people in the world live on less than 200 kronor (€22; €27) a month. If this was the situation in Sweden, a hot dog would cost the equivalent of 999 kronor. I think this is a great way to expose the issue of global inequalities and poverty!
You can buy your hot dog** at Norrmalmstorg Thursday-Saturday this week (September 15-17). The proceeds go to charity. Look for a Willy Wonka-looking stand.
* Futurniture is also the creator of the Government's "Knark är bajs" campaign
** Price includes toppings
"Hot dog 999 kronor" (€107; $133)
It obviously caught my interest, urging me to read further. Turns out it's a UNDP campaign - by PR firm Futurniture* - drawing attention to the fact that more that a billion people in the world live on less than 200 kronor (€22; €27) a month. If this was the situation in Sweden, a hot dog would cost the equivalent of 999 kronor. I think this is a great way to expose the issue of global inequalities and poverty!
You can buy your hot dog** at Norrmalmstorg Thursday-Saturday this week (September 15-17). The proceeds go to charity. Look for a Willy Wonka-looking stand.
* Futurniture is also the creator of the Government's "Knark är bajs" campaign
** Price includes toppings
Sunday, September 11, 2005
September 11
September 11 is one of those dates I will never forget. Obviously because of 9/11, the World Trade Center attacks, four years ago today, but also the murder of Anna Lindh, Sweden's Foreign Minister, two years ago. Anna Lindh was a role model, not just for us in the Social Democratic party, but for many Swedes in general and people abroad, and she was the natural successor to Göran Person, the Prime Minister. Now two years on there's still no real heir, a fact that's perhaps not causing the party's problems but definitely not helping the situation.
You can read more about Anna Lindh and her memorial fund here.
You can read more about Anna Lindh and her memorial fund here.
Wednesday, August 31, 2005
Warning
...to those of you who blog at work or about work. I have neither blogged about work nor posted at work (except for once or twice at the end of the day) but I occasionally comment on other weblogs while at work... Bad me.
Oh no
...I've been spammed, here on my poor, innocent blog! I have deleted the comments so you don't need to be tempted by offers on how to increase your credit or buying a new home insurance.
This calls for drastic measures. No, don't worry, not shutting down, just adding a word verification step in the comments. It will just take you an extra second to comment, that's it!
This calls for drastic measures. No, don't worry, not shutting down, just adding a word verification step in the comments. It will just take you an extra second to comment, that's it!
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
Real Action Movie
Stockholm experienced a spectacular security transport coup yesterday, described by witnesses "as something out of a Hollywood action blockbuster".
DN writes: "Warlike scenes played out in [the Stockholm suburb of] Hallunda at lunchtime when four people geared with automatic weapons robbed a security transport van belonging to the security firm Securitas. Moments before blowing their way into the van at Eriksbergåsen in Hallunda, the robbers put three cars on the fire on the motorway and placed nails on the road to prevent coming traffic. More cars were set ablaze on roads in the vicinity."
I actually lived 5 mins from the scene for a few months two summers ago. Go figure.
It seems like a very planned robbery. This incident is just one in a long row of attacks involving security vans (one group actually broke into Securitas' own facilities using a tractor). Who will want to take on these type of jobs if this continues? Do the police have to start protecting the security vans? Luckily some of the people involved in yesterday's incident have been arrested.
DN writes: "Warlike scenes played out in [the Stockholm suburb of] Hallunda at lunchtime when four people geared with automatic weapons robbed a security transport van belonging to the security firm Securitas. Moments before blowing their way into the van at Eriksbergåsen in Hallunda, the robbers put three cars on the fire on the motorway and placed nails on the road to prevent coming traffic. More cars were set ablaze on roads in the vicinity."
I actually lived 5 mins from the scene for a few months two summers ago. Go figure.
It seems like a very planned robbery. This incident is just one in a long row of attacks involving security vans (one group actually broke into Securitas' own facilities using a tractor). Who will want to take on these type of jobs if this continues? Do the police have to start protecting the security vans? Luckily some of the people involved in yesterday's incident have been arrested.
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Royal Encounter
Today the Swedish King Carl XVI Gustaf was involved in a accident in a round-about, albeit a minor incident. He apparently ran into the car in front of him.
It doesn't look like the other driver will press charges though. He said:
- Nah, it was just a small traffic incident. Of course it was a bit surprising when I saw that it was the King. We talked a little bit and asked each other how it was and stuff.
Probably the guy is just happy to have a story to tell his family, grandchildren, friends, etc. However, in a poll in Aftonbladet, over 77 % thinks the police should have questioned the King and tested whether he was under the influence, as is customary at any accident scene.
It doesn't look like the other driver will press charges though. He said:
- Nah, it was just a small traffic incident. Of course it was a bit surprising when I saw that it was the King. We talked a little bit and asked each other how it was and stuff.
Probably the guy is just happy to have a story to tell his family, grandchildren, friends, etc. However, in a poll in Aftonbladet, over 77 % thinks the police should have questioned the King and tested whether he was under the influence, as is customary at any accident scene.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Team Aniston
I've been a lazy blogger lately...though frequent visitor on other people's blogs. Found a hilarious site through Defamer: Automaddox.
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
Unique spam
I recently received a version of Nigerian spam that I have not encountered before. The swindler incorporated my family into the story. Little did he know that my surname is one of a kind. My grandfather made up and registered the name (Komheden) with the Swedish authorities back in the 1950s. As a result my family (four people) are the only ones with this name in Sweden and the rest of the world. So the following text did not fool me:
ATTN: ASSISTANCE OF A RESOURCE PERSON REQUIRED TOREALIZE THIS FORTUNE.
I am Barr. Patrick Diallo, an attorney at law and anotary public. On the 25th of April 2002, my client Mr. Mark Komheden, his wife and their only son were involved in a plane crash (Egypt air boeing 747 which crashed out side Tunis). Unfortunately they all lost their lives in the event of the accident, since then i have made several enquiries to locate any of my clients extended relatives and this has also proved unsuccessful. After these several unsuccessful attempts to locate any member of his family, hence I contacted you. Icontacted you to assist in repatriating the money andproperty left behind before they get confiscated or declared unserviceable by the bank where my client lodge these huge deposits. Particularly, the bank where the deceased had an account valued at about U.S $28.5million U.S dollars. Consequently, the bank issued me a notice to provide the next of kin or have the account confiscated within a short time.
Since I have been unsuccessful in locating the relatives for over some years now, I seek your consent to present you as the next of kin of the deceased since you share the same surname so that the proceeds of the account valued at U.S$28.5 million can be paid to you for both of us to share the funds; 50% to me and 45% to you, while 5% should be for expenses or tax as your government may require. I have all necessary legal documents that can be used to backup the claim. All I require is your honest cooperation to enable us see this deal through.
I guarantee that this will be executed under a legitimate arrangement that will protect you from any breach of the law. Please get in touch with me through this my e-mail to enable us discuss further. Thanks for your kind co-operation
Barr. Patrick Diallo.
ATTN: ASSISTANCE OF A RESOURCE PERSON REQUIRED TOREALIZE THIS FORTUNE.
I am Barr. Patrick Diallo, an attorney at law and anotary public. On the 25th of April 2002, my client Mr. Mark Komheden, his wife and their only son were involved in a plane crash (Egypt air boeing 747 which crashed out side Tunis). Unfortunately they all lost their lives in the event of the accident, since then i have made several enquiries to locate any of my clients extended relatives and this has also proved unsuccessful. After these several unsuccessful attempts to locate any member of his family, hence I contacted you. Icontacted you to assist in repatriating the money andproperty left behind before they get confiscated or declared unserviceable by the bank where my client lodge these huge deposits. Particularly, the bank where the deceased had an account valued at about U.S $28.5million U.S dollars. Consequently, the bank issued me a notice to provide the next of kin or have the account confiscated within a short time.
Since I have been unsuccessful in locating the relatives for over some years now, I seek your consent to present you as the next of kin of the deceased since you share the same surname so that the proceeds of the account valued at U.S$28.5 million can be paid to you for both of us to share the funds; 50% to me and 45% to you, while 5% should be for expenses or tax as your government may require. I have all necessary legal documents that can be used to backup the claim. All I require is your honest cooperation to enable us see this deal through.
I guarantee that this will be executed under a legitimate arrangement that will protect you from any breach of the law. Please get in touch with me through this my e-mail to enable us discuss further. Thanks for your kind co-operation
Barr. Patrick Diallo.
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
(Un)employment
Just spent a week in England where I was asked: "It's really amazing that Sweden has this well-developed welfare state and still can maintain excellent economic growth and such low unemployment." Low unemployment? It's approaching 6 % and if you believe the debate in Sweden you'd think Sweden was going under. (My friend thought 6 % was low.) Interesting addition to the debate...
Saturday, July 30, 2005
Nostalgia in England
I'm spending a week in England, mostly in Oxford, maybe London, so I won't be blogging again until I'm back. But do please continue the discussion!
Wednesday, July 20, 2005
Guest blogging by Anoushka Marashlian
Anoushka is a friend of mine from Oxford, and a Middle East expert. She wants to share her thoughts on the London bombings. I also invite you to follow and participate in the on-going discussion about the attacks in a previous posting of mine.
Thursday the 7th of July started off as a pretty uneventful morning. The only difference was that I was running a little late. I should have left home by 7.15 latest but it was 7.30 and I was still waiting for a train. For some reason I was pretty knackered that morning and dozed off on the train en route to King’s Cross. I get the Piccadilly Line every morning to King’s Cross where I change and get the Circle Line to Farringdon. It was about 8am that someone on the train gently tapped me on my shoulder. I opened my eyes to see an old friend of mine with whom I had lost touch with. It was great to catch up and the journey seemed more pleasant than the usual grind. I think it was about 8.10 that we got to Gloucester Road and we were told that there was a defective train or something and we were advised to get off. We were told that we could stay on the train if we wanted to but it was likely there would be delays down the line. It was a split second decision and my friend and I just got on the Circle Line at Gloucester Road. With hindsight it is now surreal to think that we went past Edgware Road and Kings Cross literally minutes before the bomb blasts. About 2 minutes after we passed Kings Cross out train was stopped in the track between Kings Cross and Farringdon. People had absolutely no idea what the problem was and I remember some where cracking jokes about the deficiencies of the London Transport system and how ill equipped it will be to meet the demands of the Olympics. Only a day before London had won the bid to stage the Olympics in 2012. I was sat on the train thinking damn I should call work and tell them that I am stuck in the train and will be running late for working. The time recorded on my mobile phone was 8.54.
I got into work at 9.10 and it was very slowly that things started to fall into place. It is strange that when you are in the middle of an event it takes much longer to make sense what is going on around. People watching the drama of the day unfold on their TV screens probably had a much better idea of what was going on than people working in the city that day. Increasingly, news started to come in via news wires and it became clear that this was no power surge but a major terrorist incident. The site of the No 30 bus with its roof blown off was the image that brought London to a standstill. Suicide bombers had transported their agenda to the streets of London and a sense of fear and uncertainty prevailed. Businesses came to a halt and it was clear that with the transport system totally suspended city workers would have to find alternative means of transport. I was very lucky that my boyfriend also works in the city since I certainly didn’t want to be alone in London that day. We walked about an hour and a half from the city, reflecting on the events of the day and trying to make sense of the senseless loss of life. It very easily could have been either of us or one of our friends who make that daily underground journey.
The question raised by the London bombings is why would five seemingly ‘normal’ British Muslims resort to taking their lives and the lives of innocent bystanders on the underground? The answer in part lies in the autocratic systems of the Middle East, in the madrasas of Pakistan and in the halls of the American Congress and the British parliament. Although Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestinian are a major part of the problem I think it would be unhelpful to view the radicalisation of Muslim youth simply through this lens. If we are to tackle and defeat the threat in our midst, then I believe it is necessary to incorporate the Muslim community who will be instrumental in preventing such outrages from occurring in the future.
The attacks have it seems strengthened rather than diminished support for Blair's Middle East policy which in turn is likely to reinforce the Prime Minister's resolve to stay on course in Iraq.
Thursday the 7th of July started off as a pretty uneventful morning. The only difference was that I was running a little late. I should have left home by 7.15 latest but it was 7.30 and I was still waiting for a train. For some reason I was pretty knackered that morning and dozed off on the train en route to King’s Cross. I get the Piccadilly Line every morning to King’s Cross where I change and get the Circle Line to Farringdon. It was about 8am that someone on the train gently tapped me on my shoulder. I opened my eyes to see an old friend of mine with whom I had lost touch with. It was great to catch up and the journey seemed more pleasant than the usual grind. I think it was about 8.10 that we got to Gloucester Road and we were told that there was a defective train or something and we were advised to get off. We were told that we could stay on the train if we wanted to but it was likely there would be delays down the line. It was a split second decision and my friend and I just got on the Circle Line at Gloucester Road. With hindsight it is now surreal to think that we went past Edgware Road and Kings Cross literally minutes before the bomb blasts. About 2 minutes after we passed Kings Cross out train was stopped in the track between Kings Cross and Farringdon. People had absolutely no idea what the problem was and I remember some where cracking jokes about the deficiencies of the London Transport system and how ill equipped it will be to meet the demands of the Olympics. Only a day before London had won the bid to stage the Olympics in 2012. I was sat on the train thinking damn I should call work and tell them that I am stuck in the train and will be running late for working. The time recorded on my mobile phone was 8.54.
I got into work at 9.10 and it was very slowly that things started to fall into place. It is strange that when you are in the middle of an event it takes much longer to make sense what is going on around. People watching the drama of the day unfold on their TV screens probably had a much better idea of what was going on than people working in the city that day. Increasingly, news started to come in via news wires and it became clear that this was no power surge but a major terrorist incident. The site of the No 30 bus with its roof blown off was the image that brought London to a standstill. Suicide bombers had transported their agenda to the streets of London and a sense of fear and uncertainty prevailed. Businesses came to a halt and it was clear that with the transport system totally suspended city workers would have to find alternative means of transport. I was very lucky that my boyfriend also works in the city since I certainly didn’t want to be alone in London that day. We walked about an hour and a half from the city, reflecting on the events of the day and trying to make sense of the senseless loss of life. It very easily could have been either of us or one of our friends who make that daily underground journey.
The question raised by the London bombings is why would five seemingly ‘normal’ British Muslims resort to taking their lives and the lives of innocent bystanders on the underground? The answer in part lies in the autocratic systems of the Middle East, in the madrasas of Pakistan and in the halls of the American Congress and the British parliament. Although Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestinian are a major part of the problem I think it would be unhelpful to view the radicalisation of Muslim youth simply through this lens. If we are to tackle and defeat the threat in our midst, then I believe it is necessary to incorporate the Muslim community who will be instrumental in preventing such outrages from occurring in the future.
The attacks have it seems strengthened rather than diminished support for Blair's Middle East policy which in turn is likely to reinforce the Prime Minister's resolve to stay on course in Iraq.
Saturday, July 16, 2005
Friday, July 15, 2005
Male friendship
Heard on SVT Gomorrow Sverige this week on the topic of male friendship: (translated freely)
Reporter: "So what is male friendship? Is it different from female friendship?"
Male 1: "We don't talk that much. We can just sit quietely."
Male 2: "Yeah, for example: 'This is a good song.' 'Yeah.' 'This [food] was tasty.' 'Yeah.'
Reporter: "So what is male friendship? Is it different from female friendship?"
Male 1: "We don't talk that much. We can just sit quietely."
Male 2: "Yeah, for example: 'This is a good song.' 'Yeah.' 'This [food] was tasty.' 'Yeah.'
Wednesday, July 13, 2005
Death among us
Today it was confirmed that it was indeed suicide bombers that committed the atrocities in London. It's a very scary thought that there are people walking among us who are willing to die for their cause. A cause which most of us wouldn't even call a cause but just an expression of madness. However, even if it is madness the sad truth is that these events have been instigated by a number of reasons and situations, causes that will never justify what happened but which can give a partial explanation as well as point to solutions.
With the confirmation that the responsible for the attacks were born and raised in Britain (and British citizens) comes the realisation that solutions must also be found at home, not just in the Middle East or further away. It's an internal and a societal problem. It's not enough to chase terrorists who are plotting terrible deeds but also to stop terrorists in the making.
In an op-ed in the New York Times a few days ago, Peter Bergen attempts to explain why British society creates terrorists. He points mainly to the young age profile of British Muslims (a third are under 16), unemployment (22 % in the 16-24 age group), and poor integration into society. This makes them prone to extremism. Bergen also points to polls that have shown that British Muslims are angry. 80 % equate the war of terror with war on islam, and 13 % said last year that a terrorist attack on the USA would be justified (however, it did not ask about terror on British soil).
In his article Bergen goes on saying that many British potential terrorists could easily come to the States as they are British citzens and don't need any special visas. He finishes with, but doesn't stress this point enough, that hardening visa regulations or introducing stricter rules and checks on other aspects of life, is one way to deal with it, but one which does not solve the deeper problem of certain groups' structural segregation, not just in Britain but globally.
In a way, even though these tragic events overshadowed a very important summit, G8 on Africa and climate change, it was perhaps "good" that it happened at this particular time (if it had to happen), since the reasons for such atrocities are intrinsically linked to the equalities of the world. We cannot address terrorism without looking at our societies and the injustices that exist, be they social, economic, religious, etc. And we need to do it together. Britain (or any other state subject to terror) cannot turn inwards, and especially not in this case since the responsible didn't come from the outside.
Thomas Friedman, in another NYTimes op-ed, writes that it takes a village to get to the root of the problem: "the greatest restraint on human behavior is never a policeman or a border guard. The greatest restraint on human behavior is what a culture and a religion deem shameful. It is what the village and its religious and political elders say is wrong or not allowed." He also says "if it's a Muslim problem, it needs a Muslim solution". That is true but I'd like to think that the rest of the global village has a part in it too.
With the confirmation that the responsible for the attacks were born and raised in Britain (and British citizens) comes the realisation that solutions must also be found at home, not just in the Middle East or further away. It's an internal and a societal problem. It's not enough to chase terrorists who are plotting terrible deeds but also to stop terrorists in the making.
In an op-ed in the New York Times a few days ago, Peter Bergen attempts to explain why British society creates terrorists. He points mainly to the young age profile of British Muslims (a third are under 16), unemployment (22 % in the 16-24 age group), and poor integration into society. This makes them prone to extremism. Bergen also points to polls that have shown that British Muslims are angry. 80 % equate the war of terror with war on islam, and 13 % said last year that a terrorist attack on the USA would be justified (however, it did not ask about terror on British soil).
In his article Bergen goes on saying that many British potential terrorists could easily come to the States as they are British citzens and don't need any special visas. He finishes with, but doesn't stress this point enough, that hardening visa regulations or introducing stricter rules and checks on other aspects of life, is one way to deal with it, but one which does not solve the deeper problem of certain groups' structural segregation, not just in Britain but globally.
In a way, even though these tragic events overshadowed a very important summit, G8 on Africa and climate change, it was perhaps "good" that it happened at this particular time (if it had to happen), since the reasons for such atrocities are intrinsically linked to the equalities of the world. We cannot address terrorism without looking at our societies and the injustices that exist, be they social, economic, religious, etc. And we need to do it together. Britain (or any other state subject to terror) cannot turn inwards, and especially not in this case since the responsible didn't come from the outside.
Thomas Friedman, in another NYTimes op-ed, writes that it takes a village to get to the root of the problem: "the greatest restraint on human behavior is never a policeman or a border guard. The greatest restraint on human behavior is what a culture and a religion deem shameful. It is what the village and its religious and political elders say is wrong or not allowed." He also says "if it's a Muslim problem, it needs a Muslim solution". That is true but I'd like to think that the rest of the global village has a part in it too.
Saturday, July 02, 2005
Turkey here I come
I'm off on vacation in Marmaris, Turkey, and will be back on July 9th. Won't be doing any blogging from the playa!!
Thursday, June 23, 2005
Vice Rice
This week Thomas L. Friedman argues in an op-ed in the New York Times that George Bush doesn't have an heir apparent and that this is a problem for him. Bush's Dick Cheney problem is caused by the fact that VP Cheney has declared that he's not running from President in 2008, which weakens the purpose of Bush's second term.
"If President Bush had a vice president, or someone who was clearly designated as heir apparent to his administration, [the president] would have a more immediate incentive to widen his political base, to offer policies that would appeal more to the center." Instead, Bush runs an agenda that doesn't worry too much about how his successor will fare.
Since I wouldn't mind if Bush went into a wall and completely committed political suicide, I should be very happy to hear this as it would pave the wave for a democratic election victory in 2008. However, I think that there is indeed an heir apparent, and that person is Condoleezza Rice, even if she's waiting behind the scenes at the moment, something that Friedman fails to address in his op-ed. She's not the VP yet but if Cheney steps down, for health reasons or because he's asked to in order to pave the way for Rice, she'll be the No 1 threat to the Democrats.
"If President Bush had a vice president, or someone who was clearly designated as heir apparent to his administration, [the president] would have a more immediate incentive to widen his political base, to offer policies that would appeal more to the center." Instead, Bush runs an agenda that doesn't worry too much about how his successor will fare.
Since I wouldn't mind if Bush went into a wall and completely committed political suicide, I should be very happy to hear this as it would pave the wave for a democratic election victory in 2008. However, I think that there is indeed an heir apparent, and that person is Condoleezza Rice, even if she's waiting behind the scenes at the moment, something that Friedman fails to address in his op-ed. She's not the VP yet but if Cheney steps down, for health reasons or because he's asked to in order to pave the way for Rice, she'll be the No 1 threat to the Democrats.
Saturday, June 18, 2005
Another meme
I came across another meme. Topic: clothes and attire
1. How many bags and pairs of shoes do you own?
I think I have four purses, two backpacks, and three or four dressy bags, to go with my three (yes, you read me right) ball dresses. I also have at least five suitcases if those are included in "bags". My four purses/bags are far from enough, and at least one is a bit worn and torn, so I definitely need to go shopping!
I probably have about 30 pairs of shoes (including sandals and flip flops) but I probably wear just 10 of them on a regular basis. Probably less even, but that was before I was able to buy four shoes for less than the price of one through work (a client who is a shoe manufacturer). I do care about animal rights in general (try to buy organic and ethical food stuffs) but as far as shoes are concerned I prefer buying leather than sweating in synthetiv materials!
2. What was the last thing you bought?
If I remember correctly it was the aforementioned shoes.
3. What was the best thing you've ever bought?
It has to be my olive green ball dress - I love it and it's always a hit with people commenting on it, etc. I wonder when I will have an opportunity to wear it again though..? Since I left Oxford I haven't been invited to that many balls..
4. The worst?
Lots of things. Stuff I have bought and worn only once, or never. But I can't think of anything that I have absolutely detested.
5. Name three people you will pass this on to?
Anyone with a blog is welcome to take it. But I also want to especially invite Johanna (work colleague who's very into clothes), Elisavet (who does risky shopping on eBay), and Åsa (who has had the experience of meeting a personal shopper at Debenhams). Use Comments for your lists!
1. How many bags and pairs of shoes do you own?
I think I have four purses, two backpacks, and three or four dressy bags, to go with my three (yes, you read me right) ball dresses. I also have at least five suitcases if those are included in "bags". My four purses/bags are far from enough, and at least one is a bit worn and torn, so I definitely need to go shopping!
I probably have about 30 pairs of shoes (including sandals and flip flops) but I probably wear just 10 of them on a regular basis. Probably less even, but that was before I was able to buy four shoes for less than the price of one through work (a client who is a shoe manufacturer). I do care about animal rights in general (try to buy organic and ethical food stuffs) but as far as shoes are concerned I prefer buying leather than sweating in synthetiv materials!
2. What was the last thing you bought?
If I remember correctly it was the aforementioned shoes.
3. What was the best thing you've ever bought?
It has to be my olive green ball dress - I love it and it's always a hit with people commenting on it, etc. I wonder when I will have an opportunity to wear it again though..? Since I left Oxford I haven't been invited to that many balls..
4. The worst?
Lots of things. Stuff I have bought and worn only once, or never. But I can't think of anything that I have absolutely detested.
5. Name three people you will pass this on to?
Anyone with a blog is welcome to take it. But I also want to especially invite Johanna (work colleague who's very into clothes), Elisavet (who does risky shopping on eBay), and Åsa (who has had the experience of meeting a personal shopper at Debenhams). Use Comments for your lists!
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
Book chain
Apparently "chain letters" are getting popular within the blogging community. I stumbled upon one which really suites my tastes, a book chain.
1. Number of books I own: Well, counting the ones at my parents and in my basement in addition to the ones in my bookshelves, I'd say 300.
2. The last book I bought: I'm a book-a-holic so I buy tons of books both online, from book clubs and in shops, but I think the latest one was The Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger. I didn't read it yet though because they need to sit on the shelf and mature a bit before I dig into them..
3. Last book I read: Uppdrag mamma, a Swedish book about motherhood, and currently The Meaning of Everything by Simon Winchester.
4. Five books that mean a lot to me:
There are few books I re-read so I'd have to list a few I've read recently:
A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson. Quite a recent book but it really should be a textbook; it gets you so interested in science, history, linguistics, everything! Most of his other books are excellent too, e.g. about the English language.
I'd also have to say "The Meaning of Everything", mentioned above. Since it's about my alma mater by extension and written in such a funny way, I'm really enjoying it.
Another great book is "The Curious Incident with the Dog at Nighttime by Mark Haddon. Since I have a brother who's handicapped/disabled/mentally challenged or whatever the term one prefers, a book about an autistic boy really appeals to me.
Not recently, but Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy. I read it back in high school when most of my classmates were reading these 1-200 page works..
A children's book I can't remember the title of but which is about a boy whose dog gets run over by a car and dies. I'd make my dad read it to me when I was little just because he always cried and I liked to see that sensitive side of him.. I know, I'm cruel.. I should mention that the little boy gets a new dog from a shelter so the story has a happy ending.
Lastly I'd have to add all of Astrid Lindgren's books; about Pippi Longtocking, Ronja the Robber's Daughter, and all the rest of them.
So now, your turn, keep the chain going!
1. Number of books I own: Well, counting the ones at my parents and in my basement in addition to the ones in my bookshelves, I'd say 300.
2. The last book I bought: I'm a book-a-holic so I buy tons of books both online, from book clubs and in shops, but I think the latest one was The Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger. I didn't read it yet though because they need to sit on the shelf and mature a bit before I dig into them..
3. Last book I read: Uppdrag mamma, a Swedish book about motherhood, and currently The Meaning of Everything by Simon Winchester.
4. Five books that mean a lot to me:
There are few books I re-read so I'd have to list a few I've read recently:
A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson. Quite a recent book but it really should be a textbook; it gets you so interested in science, history, linguistics, everything! Most of his other books are excellent too, e.g. about the English language.
I'd also have to say "The Meaning of Everything", mentioned above. Since it's about my alma mater by extension and written in such a funny way, I'm really enjoying it.
Another great book is "The Curious Incident with the Dog at Nighttime by Mark Haddon. Since I have a brother who's handicapped/disabled/mentally challenged or whatever the term one prefers, a book about an autistic boy really appeals to me.
Not recently, but Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy. I read it back in high school when most of my classmates were reading these 1-200 page works..
A children's book I can't remember the title of but which is about a boy whose dog gets run over by a car and dies. I'd make my dad read it to me when I was little just because he always cried and I liked to see that sensitive side of him.. I know, I'm cruel.. I should mention that the little boy gets a new dog from a shelter so the story has a happy ending.
Lastly I'd have to add all of Astrid Lindgren's books; about Pippi Longtocking, Ronja the Robber's Daughter, and all the rest of them.
So now, your turn, keep the chain going!
Tuesday, June 14, 2005
Monday, June 13, 2005
Quoted in the blogosphere
A bit of self-promotion. It doesn't happen that often - I really have to increase my readership - but it proves that someone is reading my blog. NEI Nuclear Notes notes the reaction to the shutdown of the Barsebäck nuclear reactor by providing links to both those condemning it versus applauding it, and those who are a bit more hesitated towards taking a stand, i.e. me.
Wednesday, June 01, 2005
Swedish milestones
Today was quite a big day in Sweden. The nuclear plant Barsebäck was shut down at midnight, after almost 30 years in service. While other countries are doing the opposite and building new plants (e.g. Finland), Sweden is implementing the results of a 1980 referendum. One reactor at Barsebäck was shut down in 1999 and now in 2005, the second and last one is on its last legs (it will actually take years to properly close operations).
I haven't really made up my mind yet what I think of it.. In a way, it is a decision that has been taken through a democratic process.. but shouldn't such decisions be amendable, as circumstances and scientific "truth" change? Because it isn't clear whether nuclear is that bad compared to if the shutting down of Barsebäck means that Sweden has to import more coal-produced energy from abroad. Maybe it's a necessary evil. On the other hand, environmentalists and one group of politicians (usually the centre left and the left) argue that we need to step away from a debate centered on the choice between two evils. By reducing Swedish reliance on nuclear energy we can push the development of alternative energy such as biofuels and solar power (wind and water power is just a small part). As long as we keep all reactors (Barsebäck is not the only plant in Sweden), that development will never gain momentum. I'm kind of attracted to this sentiment, while at the same time thinking that I would prefer shutting down dangerous nuclear plants in other countries, e.g. the former USSR, before closing the relatively safe Swedish ones. Though "safe" is not a term I really want to use in this context. The Barsebäck director mentioned on TV this morning that it will take 8 years before the work with the decontamination of the plant can even begin, before they can even enter the place.. And the issue of where to store it is far from resolved. But by 2013 a Right-wing government might have re-started the reactor, which they plan to do should they come to power in September 2006...
The other milestone which was crossed at midnight was that Sweden imposed a smoking ban at all restaurants and bars, following in the footsteps of Ireland, Italy and some American states. This is a decision that I have no problem with whatsoever!
I haven't really made up my mind yet what I think of it.. In a way, it is a decision that has been taken through a democratic process.. but shouldn't such decisions be amendable, as circumstances and scientific "truth" change? Because it isn't clear whether nuclear is that bad compared to if the shutting down of Barsebäck means that Sweden has to import more coal-produced energy from abroad. Maybe it's a necessary evil. On the other hand, environmentalists and one group of politicians (usually the centre left and the left) argue that we need to step away from a debate centered on the choice between two evils. By reducing Swedish reliance on nuclear energy we can push the development of alternative energy such as biofuels and solar power (wind and water power is just a small part). As long as we keep all reactors (Barsebäck is not the only plant in Sweden), that development will never gain momentum. I'm kind of attracted to this sentiment, while at the same time thinking that I would prefer shutting down dangerous nuclear plants in other countries, e.g. the former USSR, before closing the relatively safe Swedish ones. Though "safe" is not a term I really want to use in this context. The Barsebäck director mentioned on TV this morning that it will take 8 years before the work with the decontamination of the plant can even begin, before they can even enter the place.. And the issue of where to store it is far from resolved. But by 2013 a Right-wing government might have re-started the reactor, which they plan to do should they come to power in September 2006...
The other milestone which was crossed at midnight was that Sweden imposed a smoking ban at all restaurants and bars, following in the footsteps of Ireland, Italy and some American states. This is a decision that I have no problem with whatsoever!
Monday, May 30, 2005
Bloggressive...
...is apparently the new word for when you get angry while you're blogging. I'm angry, well, I was already before I started on this post. I'm not angry with the French result as such; they are allowed to vote in any way they want, though I had hoped people would have voted on the issue at stake instead of expressing disatisfaction with the people in power due to high unemployment levels or what have you. But that's always going to happen to some extent.
No, I'm angry with the Swedish Left Party (aka the former communists). This is a party that's usually against the EU and the supranationality and transnationalism it entails. They want Sweden to remain sovereign and don't want to secede power to the EU and its member states. However, today the Left Party is saying that the French result means that Sweden can and should abandon its ratification process. To me, that, if anything, is saying that Sweden doesn't have its own say and to let France decide instead for us. Granted, the constitutional treaty may fall in the end but we're not there yet. Until that day we should let each member state have its say, irrespective of whether it's ratification (or rejection) through a parliamentary vote or a referendum. So the Left is contradicting itself by saying that today we accept supranationality (at least as a means, if not an end). "Listen to France when it suits us."
To make matters worse, the Left had threatened to leave the Government as a results of the French vote. The Left party is not actually a coalition partner and accordingly doesn't hold any ministerial posts, but in effect, together with the Greens, it functions as a partner to the minority Social Democratic government. They threaten not to agree to the budget which is scheduled for September unless Sweden opts out of ratification. Not sure whether they are serious or whether they are in the position to demand such actions, but the whole thing just pisses me off! It's perfectly understandable that France is in a crisis but Sweden??
The French didn't even reject the constitution for the reasons the Swedish Left Party would. Not even the French Left has the same opinions. Many voted no because they don't think the EU does enough on social issues (the European social model) and think they can amend the Treaty (in effect add) and have a new vote. I.e. they want Europe to do more (even common taxation in the future). The Swedish Left would cringe if they really understood this (which they don't seem to do) because they want to move power back to the nation state, not add to the European level. Oh well.
At least these nay-sayers voted on the basis of a conviction and had actually read the constitutional treaty. I heard one guy on the news who said "I haven't read it so I'm going to vote no." Sigh.
I will end with a thought that was voiced at the seminar I attended this morning on the topic: perhaps the positive thing that will come out of today's results is that the UK will vote yes to spite the French!
No, I'm angry with the Swedish Left Party (aka the former communists). This is a party that's usually against the EU and the supranationality and transnationalism it entails. They want Sweden to remain sovereign and don't want to secede power to the EU and its member states. However, today the Left Party is saying that the French result means that Sweden can and should abandon its ratification process. To me, that, if anything, is saying that Sweden doesn't have its own say and to let France decide instead for us. Granted, the constitutional treaty may fall in the end but we're not there yet. Until that day we should let each member state have its say, irrespective of whether it's ratification (or rejection) through a parliamentary vote or a referendum. So the Left is contradicting itself by saying that today we accept supranationality (at least as a means, if not an end). "Listen to France when it suits us."
To make matters worse, the Left had threatened to leave the Government as a results of the French vote. The Left party is not actually a coalition partner and accordingly doesn't hold any ministerial posts, but in effect, together with the Greens, it functions as a partner to the minority Social Democratic government. They threaten not to agree to the budget which is scheduled for September unless Sweden opts out of ratification. Not sure whether they are serious or whether they are in the position to demand such actions, but the whole thing just pisses me off! It's perfectly understandable that France is in a crisis but Sweden??
The French didn't even reject the constitution for the reasons the Swedish Left Party would. Not even the French Left has the same opinions. Many voted no because they don't think the EU does enough on social issues (the European social model) and think they can amend the Treaty (in effect add) and have a new vote. I.e. they want Europe to do more (even common taxation in the future). The Swedish Left would cringe if they really understood this (which they don't seem to do) because they want to move power back to the nation state, not add to the European level. Oh well.
At least these nay-sayers voted on the basis of a conviction and had actually read the constitutional treaty. I heard one guy on the news who said "I haven't read it so I'm going to vote no." Sigh.
I will end with a thought that was voiced at the seminar I attended this morning on the topic: perhaps the positive thing that will come out of today's results is that the UK will vote yes to spite the French!
Sunday, May 29, 2005
Non Constitution
The first results are in and it looks like France has voted non to the EU constitution. Sadly so, in my opinion. However, this does not need to be 'the end of the EU', as some people seem to think.
A few weeks back I attended a seminar on the EU organised by the Swedish government, where Magnus Rohback from the (Swedish) Prime Minister's Office presented his thoughts on the future of the EU in the light of the French referendum.
He identified the following points as the main issues right now:
1) The ratification of the Constitution
2) The 2007-13 budget negotiations
3) Further development and realisation of the internal market (the Services Directive, common rules for financial markets, state aid, consumer protection, etc.)
4) Common actions for sustainable growth, employment, environment, etc.
5) Enlargement
6) The implementation of the Hague Programme, i.e. asylum, migration, judicial cooperation, mainly combatting organised cross-border crime and terrorism)
7) The EU's international role (cooperation with Russia, Iraq, the Middle East, the WTO Doha round, the UN Millenium conference, etc.)
Mr Rohback mentioned that one of the reasons for the Constitution was that it was seen as a way to manage and make functionable, an enlarged Union (remember that behind the Constitution Treaty is three years of work). However, enlargement (+10) has taken place and so far it has not affected the EU negatively. On the contrary, it has made procedures more austere, disciplined and effective.
Even so, the political significance of a French rejection is huge:
- the legislative process will lose pace or even stop;
- it will become increasingly difficult to reach hard compromises;
- the process of further enlargement will be increasingly complicated (enlargement being one of the reasons for French refusal);
- there is risk that the Union become introverted, affecting its international role.
But even with a French no, the process will go on (and should go on, I believe). The EU has gone through periods of sclerosis before, which doesn't necessarily need to be a bad thing. It is a time of consolidation, of catching up. The work (see points 2-7 above) will continue even if the bigger visions have been momentarily lost. Throughout the history of the EU there has been a constant pull between visions and the every-day work of implementing EU policy. In the 1970s and early 1980s there was a period of stagnation, which originated in a questioning of the identity and purpose of the EU, partly due to the accession of the UK to the Union. Today we may be in a similar downturn; however, it is NOT the end.
A few weeks back I attended a seminar on the EU organised by the Swedish government, where Magnus Rohback from the (Swedish) Prime Minister's Office presented his thoughts on the future of the EU in the light of the French referendum.
He identified the following points as the main issues right now:
1) The ratification of the Constitution
2) The 2007-13 budget negotiations
3) Further development and realisation of the internal market (the Services Directive, common rules for financial markets, state aid, consumer protection, etc.)
4) Common actions for sustainable growth, employment, environment, etc.
5) Enlargement
6) The implementation of the Hague Programme, i.e. asylum, migration, judicial cooperation, mainly combatting organised cross-border crime and terrorism)
7) The EU's international role (cooperation with Russia, Iraq, the Middle East, the WTO Doha round, the UN Millenium conference, etc.)
Mr Rohback mentioned that one of the reasons for the Constitution was that it was seen as a way to manage and make functionable, an enlarged Union (remember that behind the Constitution Treaty is three years of work). However, enlargement (+10) has taken place and so far it has not affected the EU negatively. On the contrary, it has made procedures more austere, disciplined and effective.
Even so, the political significance of a French rejection is huge:
- the legislative process will lose pace or even stop;
- it will become increasingly difficult to reach hard compromises;
- the process of further enlargement will be increasingly complicated (enlargement being one of the reasons for French refusal);
- there is risk that the Union become introverted, affecting its international role.
But even with a French no, the process will go on (and should go on, I believe). The EU has gone through periods of sclerosis before, which doesn't necessarily need to be a bad thing. It is a time of consolidation, of catching up. The work (see points 2-7 above) will continue even if the bigger visions have been momentarily lost. Throughout the history of the EU there has been a constant pull between visions and the every-day work of implementing EU policy. In the 1970s and early 1980s there was a period of stagnation, which originated in a questioning of the identity and purpose of the EU, partly due to the accession of the UK to the Union. Today we may be in a similar downturn; however, it is NOT the end.
Wednesday, May 25, 2005
Oxford Wants My Money
The University of Oxford is trying to deal with the hot issue of its future at the moment, boiling down to whether it should stick to the present system or go independent (i.e. free itself from the government's reigns).
However, what caught my attention in the Economist article was that they are expecting me to pay for it!
"If Oxford declared independence, it would lose the £52m undergraduate subsidy at least. Could it fill the hole? Certainly. America's top universities charge around £20,000 per student per year. The difficult issue would not be money alone: it would be balancing numbers of not-so-brilliant rich people paying top whack with the cleverer poorer ones they were cross-subsidising. America's top universities manage it: high fees mean better teaching, which keeps competition hot and academic standards high, while luring enough donations to provide bursaries for the poor. It should be easier to extract money from alumni if Oxford were no longer state-funded."
Well, one day I might make enough money to be able to share it... So far I've chosen to hold onto it tight. When I was reimbursed for water problems while staying in college accommodation I was asked to donate the grand total sum of £250. I greedily rejected the "offer".
However, what caught my attention in the Economist article was that they are expecting me to pay for it!
"If Oxford declared independence, it would lose the £52m undergraduate subsidy at least. Could it fill the hole? Certainly. America's top universities charge around £20,000 per student per year. The difficult issue would not be money alone: it would be balancing numbers of not-so-brilliant rich people paying top whack with the cleverer poorer ones they were cross-subsidising. America's top universities manage it: high fees mean better teaching, which keeps competition hot and academic standards high, while luring enough donations to provide bursaries for the poor. It should be easier to extract money from alumni if Oxford were no longer state-funded."
Well, one day I might make enough money to be able to share it... So far I've chosen to hold onto it tight. When I was reimbursed for water problems while staying in college accommodation I was asked to donate the grand total sum of £250. I greedily rejected the "offer".
Saturday, May 21, 2005
Swedish Lesson
I want to introduce you to How to learn Swedish in 1000 difficult lessons. Thought it would be a good way for you, my international friends (and other foreign visitors to my blog), to learn Swedish. Here's the author's intro:
"Francis Strand is a 44-year-old American magazine editor living in Stockholm. He is married to a Swedish man, which is legal in Sweden, more or less. The two met in Barcelona in July 1998 and were married in June 2000. Strand has 'a high opinion of Swedes'. Although he loves the country and people, his attempts to become fluent in Swedish have been less than successful."
I especially find the "more or less" comment intriguing...
"Francis Strand is a 44-year-old American magazine editor living in Stockholm. He is married to a Swedish man, which is legal in Sweden, more or less. The two met in Barcelona in July 1998 and were married in June 2000. Strand has 'a high opinion of Swedes'. Although he loves the country and people, his attempts to become fluent in Swedish have been less than successful."
I especially find the "more or less" comment intriguing...
Friday, May 20, 2005
Sick Time TV
I was down with flu-like symptoms this week and only managed to go to work today. Since watching telly is almost the only thing one can do to pass the time, I'm now fully up-to-date with the latest developments on everything from McLeod's Daughters to According to Jim, and the theme song from 7th Heaven is stuck in my head. Luckily I was able to avoid the likes of "The Bold and the Beautiful" (don't even deserve a direct link!).
And tonight I installed digital TV... but I promise just to watch high quality evening series!
And tonight I installed digital TV... but I promise just to watch high quality evening series!
Thursday, May 19, 2005
Gossip
Nah, I don't have any juicy stories to tell you myself but I can point you to a good site that does. A little introduction:
"In so far as a city ever needed a gossip rag, Los Angeles is crying out for a Defamer. For a city that’s in many ways the cultural capital of the world, it’s woefully under-gossiped. Sure, the celebrity weeklies give the latest tittle-tattle on the reality TV romance of the week. But the real stars of Hollywood are the producers, the agents, the PR flacks, the studio execs, and the screenwriters. They’re usually behind the scenes. No longer—since May 2004, there’s Defamer, putting them front and center. "
Not necessarily agreeing with L.A. being the cultural capital of the world...but I sure enjoy all the inside info and especially the humour! Defamer won the 2005 bloggie award for best entertainment weblog!
"In so far as a city ever needed a gossip rag, Los Angeles is crying out for a Defamer. For a city that’s in many ways the cultural capital of the world, it’s woefully under-gossiped. Sure, the celebrity weeklies give the latest tittle-tattle on the reality TV romance of the week. But the real stars of Hollywood are the producers, the agents, the PR flacks, the studio execs, and the screenwriters. They’re usually behind the scenes. No longer—since May 2004, there’s Defamer, putting them front and center. "
Not necessarily agreeing with L.A. being the cultural capital of the world...but I sure enjoy all the inside info and especially the humour! Defamer won the 2005 bloggie award for best entertainment weblog!
Sunday, May 15, 2005
Ikea Saves the Day...
...or marriage rather. At least according to the new book "Great Ikea! A Brand for all the People". Apparently Ikea is the place to go if you want to find romance or harmony.
The author, Elen Lewis, claims that Ikea lets the men be men and confirms their manhood. Likewise the already married man's "hunting instincts" are satisfied when he "hunts" furniture for his home and gets to spend money in front of wife and kids, which in turn arouses the woman. According to Lewis, Ikea is one of the few brands that can actually change your life.
The book doesn't enlighten us as to which instincts, except the "natural" housewife ones, women satisfy by going to Ikea.
7 reasons why Ikea saves married bliss:
1. Non-assembled furniture. When the man succeeds at assembling shelves and tables, his manhood is confirmed.
2. The hunting instinct. Treat your marriage to a trip to Ikea so the husband can "hunt and gather" for the home. Will bring happiness.
3. The feeling of creating a home together creates harmony in the marriage.
4. Sex. Women are turned on when the assembling goes smoothly. What happens when there are screws missing (which is often) is not clear. Nor how men react to handy woman.
5. The beds. It is estimated that at least every ten babies in Europe were made in a bed from Ikea.
6. The food. Many couples allegedly choose Ikea's meatballs as their first choice for a romantic Valentine's Day dinner. What??!!
7. Wedding. A Canadian couple chose to get married at Ikea.
The author, Elen Lewis, claims that Ikea lets the men be men and confirms their manhood. Likewise the already married man's "hunting instincts" are satisfied when he "hunts" furniture for his home and gets to spend money in front of wife and kids, which in turn arouses the woman. According to Lewis, Ikea is one of the few brands that can actually change your life.
The book doesn't enlighten us as to which instincts, except the "natural" housewife ones, women satisfy by going to Ikea.
7 reasons why Ikea saves married bliss:
1. Non-assembled furniture. When the man succeeds at assembling shelves and tables, his manhood is confirmed.
2. The hunting instinct. Treat your marriage to a trip to Ikea so the husband can "hunt and gather" for the home. Will bring happiness.
3. The feeling of creating a home together creates harmony in the marriage.
4. Sex. Women are turned on when the assembling goes smoothly. What happens when there are screws missing (which is often) is not clear. Nor how men react to handy woman.
5. The beds. It is estimated that at least every ten babies in Europe were made in a bed from Ikea.
6. The food. Many couples allegedly choose Ikea's meatballs as their first choice for a romantic Valentine's Day dinner. What??!!
7. Wedding. A Canadian couple chose to get married at Ikea.
Thursday, May 12, 2005
Elephant On the Loose in Stockholm
The newspaper Dagens Nyheter tells the story (translated):
"An elephant is on the loose in Stockholm. The news came from our tippers, who had heard on the police radio that two patrolling cars were on their way to Enskedefältet to attend to an elephant that had escaped from a circus.
There is no time to lose. We have to get a picture of the escaped elephant before it is caught.
Quickly heading to the photographer's car. On our way towards Årsta we hear the news on the radio. 'We're breaking for traffic information. We have an elephant warning, yes, you heard it correctly, elephant warning by Huddinge Road.'
We start looking into the bushes and on the golf course, but no elephant.
The informer said that it could be in a residential area. The photographer curses the fact that the camera is in the trunk of the car and wonder if it's okay to stop on the highway.
I wonder if we dare leave the car if we see the elephant. And we discuss whether it is an African or an Indian elephant. The African is bigger, but what about agressiveness? Even a small Indian one can probably be as terrifying if it's stressed. It was safari mood in the Spring sun in Enskede.
But it was a story which was too good to be true. A simple check with the circus shows it is false alarm.
Later the police tells us that somebody called in about the escaped elephant after having seen an elephant when it was being exercised. According to the circus the elephant Lubli is so good that she is allowed to walk around freely.
Always check a good story, that is the conclusion. But some adrenalinfilled elephant hunt on a regular, boring no news Thursday was still not wrong."
For pictures, click here.
"An elephant is on the loose in Stockholm. The news came from our tippers, who had heard on the police radio that two patrolling cars were on their way to Enskedefältet to attend to an elephant that had escaped from a circus.
There is no time to lose. We have to get a picture of the escaped elephant before it is caught.
Quickly heading to the photographer's car. On our way towards Årsta we hear the news on the radio. 'We're breaking for traffic information. We have an elephant warning, yes, you heard it correctly, elephant warning by Huddinge Road.'
We start looking into the bushes and on the golf course, but no elephant.
The informer said that it could be in a residential area. The photographer curses the fact that the camera is in the trunk of the car and wonder if it's okay to stop on the highway.
I wonder if we dare leave the car if we see the elephant. And we discuss whether it is an African or an Indian elephant. The African is bigger, but what about agressiveness? Even a small Indian one can probably be as terrifying if it's stressed. It was safari mood in the Spring sun in Enskede.
But it was a story which was too good to be true. A simple check with the circus shows it is false alarm.
Later the police tells us that somebody called in about the escaped elephant after having seen an elephant when it was being exercised. According to the circus the elephant Lubli is so good that she is allowed to walk around freely.
Always check a good story, that is the conclusion. But some adrenalinfilled elephant hunt on a regular, boring no news Thursday was still not wrong."
For pictures, click here.
Thursday, April 28, 2005
Oxford No 1
Ha! We might not beat them in the Boat Race every year or very often at all in fact(though we did this year) but we're now No 1 in the Guardian's annual education guide! The newspaper's university league table, which assesses teaching quality, staff-student ratios and graduate job prospects, has placed Oxford at the top, ahead of Cambridge, Imperial College, SOAS and LSE (full list).
More good news for me, having read European studies, is that Oxford ranked No 1 also in politics!
So maybe that dream job is just around the corner?! Employers should be flocking to hire me!
More good news for me, having read European studies, is that Oxford ranked No 1 also in politics!
So maybe that dream job is just around the corner?! Employers should be flocking to hire me!
Tuesday, April 26, 2005
New Feature
I've added a new permanent section in the right column - where I try to enlighten my readers by suggesting reading materials, both fact and fiction! I welcome comments, reviews, reading tips, etc.!
Monday, April 25, 2005
A Voice from Victorian Past
The latest edition of Oxford Today, the University of Oxford tri-annual alumni magazine had a little notice about a time capsule that was found while doing renovation work on the Sheldonian Theatre. For those of you who don't know the University, or the city of Oxford for that matter, the Sheldonian is the venue for matriculation (Oxford lingo for being officially and ceremonially registered as a student) and graduation as well as various concerts and lectures. The article tells us:
Builders "discovered a metal time capsule left by a worker in 1901 when the [painted] ceiling was last dismantled for repairs. Inside the capsule was a hand-written note from builder Frank Morrill, together with a pair of Victorian workman's trousers and some tools, including a bradawl. Mr Morrill gives instructions to whoever finds the 'valuable treasure' to hand them over to a museum, before signing off, 'Yours in ashes?'. Mr Jeffrey Hackney, Chairman of the Curators of the Sheldonian, said the trousers will be offered to a local museum in line with Mr Morrill's wishes."
I wonder what the 21st century builder would leave behind?
Builders "discovered a metal time capsule left by a worker in 1901 when the [painted] ceiling was last dismantled for repairs. Inside the capsule was a hand-written note from builder Frank Morrill, together with a pair of Victorian workman's trousers and some tools, including a bradawl. Mr Morrill gives instructions to whoever finds the 'valuable treasure' to hand them over to a museum, before signing off, 'Yours in ashes?'. Mr Jeffrey Hackney, Chairman of the Curators of the Sheldonian, said the trousers will be offered to a local museum in line with Mr Morrill's wishes."
I wonder what the 21st century builder would leave behind?
Monday, April 18, 2005
Vote Oui
"If we say no to the Constitution to say no to the Europe we don't like, then we end up with the Europe we don't like."
Daniel Cohn-Bendit, MEP (and leader for the 1968 revolt in Paris)
Daniel Cohn-Bendit, MEP (and leader for the 1968 revolt in Paris)
Thursday, April 14, 2005
What Has Europe Ever Done for Us?
"It's not an uncommon question and one that is not unreasonable. Europe's contribution to your daily life is not always obvious, but decisions taken on a European level have fundamentally improved thousands of small and big things ranging from cheaper phone calls to European wide health coverage."
Tell a friend!
Tell a friend!
Wednesday, April 13, 2005
The EU Welcomes Bulgaria and Romania
Well, not yet, but the European Parliament gives green light to these two remaining candidates from the Central and Eastern European (original) batch. The Parliament doesn't have the formal right to grant membership but is able to push for postponement by a year if a country fails to implement all measures deemed necessary to allow accession, through the so-called safeguard clause. Both countries still have a few outstanding reforms to take care of but seem to be on schedule to join the EU in 2007 as planned.
Meanwhile, several other countries may become EU members in the future...
Meanwhile, several other countries may become EU members in the future...
Monday, April 04, 2005
"Who wants a sweet with the wrapper still on?"
The above refers to a saying in Africa, which contributes to African socities' distrust of condoms. A recent article in the New York Times tells the sad story of many people, especially women, in this part of the world. Titled "When marriage kills" it deals with the fact that marriage is probably the No 1 "carrier" of HIV and Aids.
"Sex kills all the time, particularly here in Africa. But prudishness can be just as lethal. President Bush is focusing his program against AIDS in Africa on sexual abstinence and marital fidelity, relegating condoms to a distant third. It's the kind of well-meaning policy that bubbles up out of a White House prayer meeting but that will mean a lot of unnecessary deaths on the ground in Africa. The stark reality is that what kills young women here is often not promiscuity, but marriage. Indeed, just about the deadliest thing a woman in southern Africa can do is get married."
If you're located in or visiting Sweden, do pay a visit to the excellent exhibition on HIV/Aids at the Museum of World Culture in Göteborg.
"Sex kills all the time, particularly here in Africa. But prudishness can be just as lethal. President Bush is focusing his program against AIDS in Africa on sexual abstinence and marital fidelity, relegating condoms to a distant third. It's the kind of well-meaning policy that bubbles up out of a White House prayer meeting but that will mean a lot of unnecessary deaths on the ground in Africa. The stark reality is that what kills young women here is often not promiscuity, but marriage. Indeed, just about the deadliest thing a woman in southern Africa can do is get married."
If you're located in or visiting Sweden, do pay a visit to the excellent exhibition on HIV/Aids at the Museum of World Culture in Göteborg.
Friday, April 01, 2005
April Fool's Day
I discovered this great site for April Fool's Day hoaxes where the No 3 is a Swedish classic: Instant Colour TV.
"In 1962 there was only one tv channel in Sweden, and it broadcast in black and white. The station's technical expert, Kjell Stensson, appeared on the news to announce that thanks to a newly developed technology, all viewers could now quickly and easily convert their existing sets to display color reception. All they had to do was pull a nylon stocking over their tv screen, and they would begin to see their favorite shows in color. Stensson then proceeded to demonstrate the process. Reportedly, hundreds of thousands of people, out of the population of seven million, were taken in. Actual color tv transmission only commenced in Sweden on April 1, 1970."
Don't forget the comments! For example,
"It's all true. I should know. It was the very first time my dad got the nylons off my mother. Nine months later, I was born."
or
"the Norwegians had a similar one in the sixties: It was told in the news on the only TV channel that if you turned of all powerconsuming devices in the house, except for the television set you would get color. The funny part was that if you were staning in your window you could see the "darkness" spreading while people turned of all lightsources to verify the claim."
"In 1962 there was only one tv channel in Sweden, and it broadcast in black and white. The station's technical expert, Kjell Stensson, appeared on the news to announce that thanks to a newly developed technology, all viewers could now quickly and easily convert their existing sets to display color reception. All they had to do was pull a nylon stocking over their tv screen, and they would begin to see their favorite shows in color. Stensson then proceeded to demonstrate the process. Reportedly, hundreds of thousands of people, out of the population of seven million, were taken in. Actual color tv transmission only commenced in Sweden on April 1, 1970."
Don't forget the comments! For example,
"It's all true. I should know. It was the very first time my dad got the nylons off my mother. Nine months later, I was born."
or
"the Norwegians had a similar one in the sixties: It was told in the news on the only TV channel that if you turned of all powerconsuming devices in the house, except for the television set you would get color. The funny part was that if you were staning in your window you could see the "darkness" spreading while people turned of all lightsources to verify the claim."
Wednesday, March 30, 2005
Who's that with Jeremy
Thanks to a friend I discovered this cute site about a little boy's encounters with celebrities - he sure has some influential and famous friends!
Tuesday, March 29, 2005
Food Tasting
Today after work I attended a food tasting at a market survey institute. I signed up ages ago after a friend of mine told me about it but haven't been able to actually taste anything until now. I thought I'd find myself among hords of students trying to make that extra buck (yes, it is paid) but it was actually a mix of ages. Tonight's menu consisted of caramel and chocolate toppings and sour cream. Not at the same time though. I was actually a bit disappointed that the point of the study wasn't to come up with new recipes with as few ingredients as possible, but to say the least, I enjoyed it. Between tasting you were encouraged to sip some water or nibble on some crackers, just like wine tasting at Oxford. It was not the kind of social gathering I had hoped for though (there goes my thinking that this could be a way to meet guys) as you're seated in a little booth by yourself with just the tasting items and a computer as company. Depending on how quickly you "eat" and answer questions about taste, texture, etc. you're free to leave whenever you want to. On my way out I saw the remnants of a wine tasting so expect to hear more about future tastings!
Monday, March 28, 2005
Margot Wallström
For those of you who don't know (of) her, she's the Swedish EU Commissioner. Previously the Commissioner for the Environment, she's now Vice President of the Commission and responsible for Institutional Relations and Communication Strategy . Recently she too has joined the blogger community, visit her blog.
Tuesday, March 22, 2005
Affiliated
Okay, my first action of the re-launch of Anna, Fair and True, is giving credits to the two bloggers who inspired me to explore blogdom myself. See links on the right.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)