200 years of global development in 4 minutes - explained vividly by Swedish professor and statistics guru Hans Rosling.
Showing posts with label Equity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Equity. Show all posts
Monday, February 21, 2011
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Show & Tell: Christmas Presents
Not everyone looks forward to Christmas. The single mother who cannot afford to buy presents. The child who knows his or her parents will drink too much and fight their way through Christmas. The child swimming in presents but gasping for love from distant though present parents.
Read an article by Eva Franchell* on the Nordic Council site that made me reflect for a moment.
Her piece is titled Three images of Sweden just before Christmas 2009.
Rosengård on the outskirts of Malmö - Children living in misery and pure poverty. Cockroaches and mold. Ten people in a two-bedroom flat. 10% of Swedish children are considered poor** - in Rosengård it is 60%***.
Nyfors, Eskilstuna - Young people looking for jobs that are not to be found. 7% unemployment. Young people start their life as adults with a trip to the welfare office. Or resort to crime.
Stureplan, Stockholm - A handbag still costs over 10,000 SEK (920 euros). The international crisis is not to be seen. The shops are expecting record sales also this Christmas.
Eva writes that the market analysts in Stockholm are saying that the crisis is over. But, she continues, for many people around Sweden it has just begun. The share of Swedes on welfare benefits has increased with 20% compared to last year - but most of them do not live in Stockholm, at least not in the centre, instead they live in industrial towns where some companies, usually those supplying other, bigger industries, have had to close or lay off workers. The municipalities have received their share of the national rescue package but often it is only enough to cover the additional welfare benefits expenses.
Eva makes the issue political - and rightly so; politics is about people's different views about people and society - but I'm not going to do that today. I just want to highlight that there are people even in Sweden, both before and after the economic crisis, who are not that well off and could do with some help. And what better time than Christmas to think of a fellow human being. Because I do believe that we're all the same deep down irrespective of where we live, in the rich suburb or on the street. We all have the same needs to eat, sleep and love.
So, buy some presents for your loved ones as you usually do - I will - but for every gift you buy, send a thought to those less fortunate in society and preferably a monetary gift too.
For example, to/through Stadsmissionen:
Read an article by Eva Franchell* on the Nordic Council site that made me reflect for a moment.
Her piece is titled Three images of Sweden just before Christmas 2009.
Rosengård on the outskirts of Malmö - Children living in misery and pure poverty. Cockroaches and mold. Ten people in a two-bedroom flat. 10% of Swedish children are considered poor** - in Rosengård it is 60%***.
Nyfors, Eskilstuna - Young people looking for jobs that are not to be found. 7% unemployment. Young people start their life as adults with a trip to the welfare office. Or resort to crime.
Stureplan, Stockholm - A handbag still costs over 10,000 SEK (920 euros). The international crisis is not to be seen. The shops are expecting record sales also this Christmas.
Eva writes that the market analysts in Stockholm are saying that the crisis is over. But, she continues, for many people around Sweden it has just begun. The share of Swedes on welfare benefits has increased with 20% compared to last year - but most of them do not live in Stockholm, at least not in the centre, instead they live in industrial towns where some companies, usually those supplying other, bigger industries, have had to close or lay off workers. The municipalities have received their share of the national rescue package but often it is only enough to cover the additional welfare benefits expenses.
Eva makes the issue political - and rightly so; politics is about people's different views about people and society - but I'm not going to do that today. I just want to highlight that there are people even in Sweden, both before and after the economic crisis, who are not that well off and could do with some help. And what better time than Christmas to think of a fellow human being. Because I do believe that we're all the same deep down irrespective of where we live, in the rich suburb or on the street. We all have the same needs to eat, sleep and love.
So, buy some presents for your loved ones as you usually do - I will - but for every gift you buy, send a thought to those less fortunate in society and preferably a monetary gift too.
For example, to/through Stadsmissionen:
Or Rädda Barnen:
* Probably most known as the best friend of Anna Lindh, the Swedish Foreign Minister who was murdered in 2003
** This is in an international comparison very low but it doesn't make their plight more bearable.
*** But there is also hope in Rosengård. The now world-famous footballer Zlatan comes from Rosengård. But, as Eva rightly points out, Zlatan is not only a symbol of hope and success despite humble origins; but also of growing inequalities between rich and poor
Show & Tell
I should also say that Nilla is our Show & Tell hostess for December. You can see the rest of her topics in one of the right-hand column.
Tuesday, October 06, 2009
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Only a Click
* Donate your old shoes - and especially those ugly Crocs
* Offset your carbon emissions online
* One click a day for breast cancer
* Offset your carbon emissions online
* One click a day for breast cancer
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Mr President(ial Candidate), Sort Out the Healthcare System!
I've written on the issue of different healthcare systems before. I came across this article on the American health service in my saved items in my inbox and wanted to share it with you. It's a year old but it feels very topical.
America’s Lagging Health Care System (editorial in New York Times, November 2007)
Americans are increasingly frustrated about the subpar performance of this country’s fragmented health care system, and with good reason. A new survey of patients in seven industrialized nations underscores just how badly sick Americans fare compared with patients in other nations. One-third of the American respondents felt their system is so dysfunctional that it needs to be rebuilt completely — the highest rate in any country surveyed. The system was given poor scores both by low-income, uninsured patients and by many higher-income patients.
The survey, the latest in a series from the Commonwealth Fund, is being published today on the Web site of Health Affairs, a respected health policy journal. Researchers interviewed some 12,000 adults in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Given the large number of people uninsured or poorly insured in this country, it was no surprise that Americans were the most likely to go without care because of costs. Fully 37 percent of the American respondents said that they chose not to visit a doctor when sick, skipped a recommended test or treatment or failed to fill a prescription in the past year because of the cost — well above the rates in other countries.
Patients here were more likely to get appointments quickly for elective surgery than those in nearly all the other countries. But access to primary care doctors, the mainstay of medical practice, was often rocky. Only half of the American adults were able to see a doctor the same day that they became sick or the day after, a worse showing than in all the other countries except Canada. Getting care on nights and weekends was problematic. Often the care here was substandard. Americans reported the highest rate of lab test errors and the second-highest rate of medical or medication errors.
The findings underscore the need to ensure that all Americans have quick access to a primary care doctor and the need for universal health coverage — so that all patients can afford the care they need. That’s what all of the presidential candidates should be talking about.
America’s Lagging Health Care System (editorial in New York Times, November 2007)
Americans are increasingly frustrated about the subpar performance of this country’s fragmented health care system, and with good reason. A new survey of patients in seven industrialized nations underscores just how badly sick Americans fare compared with patients in other nations. One-third of the American respondents felt their system is so dysfunctional that it needs to be rebuilt completely — the highest rate in any country surveyed. The system was given poor scores both by low-income, uninsured patients and by many higher-income patients.
The survey, the latest in a series from the Commonwealth Fund, is being published today on the Web site of Health Affairs, a respected health policy journal. Researchers interviewed some 12,000 adults in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Given the large number of people uninsured or poorly insured in this country, it was no surprise that Americans were the most likely to go without care because of costs. Fully 37 percent of the American respondents said that they chose not to visit a doctor when sick, skipped a recommended test or treatment or failed to fill a prescription in the past year because of the cost — well above the rates in other countries.
Patients here were more likely to get appointments quickly for elective surgery than those in nearly all the other countries. But access to primary care doctors, the mainstay of medical practice, was often rocky. Only half of the American adults were able to see a doctor the same day that they became sick or the day after, a worse showing than in all the other countries except Canada. Getting care on nights and weekends was problematic. Often the care here was substandard. Americans reported the highest rate of lab test errors and the second-highest rate of medical or medication errors.
The findings underscore the need to ensure that all Americans have quick access to a primary care doctor and the need for universal health coverage — so that all patients can afford the care they need. That’s what all of the presidential candidates should be talking about.
Thursday, October 25, 2007
A Bit of Sicko in the Swedish Healthcare System
Johanna Graf is always so spot on! I agree with her completely so I have translated her post:
"Unfortunately I have to throw up...
...because this is one of the most tasteless things I have heard. A private children's hospital is opening at Sophiahemmet in Stockholm [where] children of parents who have paid into a private child insurance can receive care. In a web survey carried out by [the tabloid] Aftonbladet it is admittedly a majority who thinks it is wrong with privately financed [through insurance] children's healthcare, but alarmingly many who still think it is a good idea. Maybe they have fallen for the insidious talk that is always brought out when private care is the topic; "But, if more people pay for their care themselves, the pressure on the public health service will be relieved and it can work better".
But think one step further! What do you think happens to the private caretakers' willingness to pay for care they no longer need, or need less and less often? What happens with the strength of a tax system where some, often those who are less willing to pay, do not think that the quality of the service that they are getting for their money is good enough, och therefore join another [health] insurance system?
In the particular case with private children's hospitals one can also quietly ask oneself what will happen with children who are born sick and in all likelihood have not yet been - or would never be - granted a private insurance?
This with private children's insurances is already today a chapter to itself. My middle son gave the wrong answer during a hearing test at the children's health centre and is still to this day, at age 16, not granted a full child insurance with our insurance company. And I have heard a lot worse stories. NO to such a society!
In the long term one could ask why all of us together must pay for their expensive medical training if many doctors only devote themselves to help those who pay the most for their services?
To be very clear, so that no one goes mad now: What I'm criticising is NOT private care, but private insurances. (It is the same thing with the education system: It is not the free-standing schools that is the problem, it is the financing system that moves tax money around in an eternal moving merry-go-around that is very financially unsound.)
It makes me happy that it is not only Social Democrats who criticise these systems. Also the Swedish Association of Health Professionals is a warning voice: "The risk is that the cleavages in society increase, that those who cannot afford to pay receive worse care and that the public health service cannot be financed at the same level as today."
Less that three years to the election, but there are unfortunately a lot that can be destroyed before then."
"Unfortunately I have to throw up...
...because this is one of the most tasteless things I have heard. A private children's hospital is opening at Sophiahemmet in Stockholm [where] children of parents who have paid into a private child insurance can receive care. In a web survey carried out by [the tabloid] Aftonbladet it is admittedly a majority who thinks it is wrong with privately financed [through insurance] children's healthcare, but alarmingly many who still think it is a good idea. Maybe they have fallen for the insidious talk that is always brought out when private care is the topic; "But, if more people pay for their care themselves, the pressure on the public health service will be relieved and it can work better".
But think one step further! What do you think happens to the private caretakers' willingness to pay for care they no longer need, or need less and less often? What happens with the strength of a tax system where some, often those who are less willing to pay, do not think that the quality of the service that they are getting for their money is good enough, och therefore join another [health] insurance system?
In the particular case with private children's hospitals one can also quietly ask oneself what will happen with children who are born sick and in all likelihood have not yet been - or would never be - granted a private insurance?
This with private children's insurances is already today a chapter to itself. My middle son gave the wrong answer during a hearing test at the children's health centre and is still to this day, at age 16, not granted a full child insurance with our insurance company. And I have heard a lot worse stories. NO to such a society!
In the long term one could ask why all of us together must pay for their expensive medical training if many doctors only devote themselves to help those who pay the most for their services?
To be very clear, so that no one goes mad now: What I'm criticising is NOT private care, but private insurances. (It is the same thing with the education system: It is not the free-standing schools that is the problem, it is the financing system that moves tax money around in an eternal moving merry-go-around that is very financially unsound.)
It makes me happy that it is not only Social Democrats who criticise these systems. Also the Swedish Association of Health Professionals is a warning voice: "The risk is that the cleavages in society increase, that those who cannot afford to pay receive worse care and that the public health service cannot be financed at the same level as today."
Less that three years to the election, but there are unfortunately a lot that can be destroyed before then."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)